Incidence and Resolution Strategies for Early-Onset Postoperative Leg Pain Following Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

Overview

Journal Int J Spine Surg

Date 2021 Sep 23

PMID 34551924

Authors

Richard D Guyer

Nicole Ferko

Ashley Bonner

Aaron Situ

Donna D Ohnmeiss

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) has produced results similar or superior to fusion in treating symptomatic disc degeneration. Some patients have reported onset of leg pain early after surgery. Little information is available specifically on this problem. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of early-onset postoperative leg pain following lumbar TDR and to describe strategies for its treatment.

Methods: The study was based on a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected adverse event data from 283 patients in the activL Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study. Early-onset leg pain was defined as occurring between 0 and 4 weeks postprocedure, and the baseline visual analog scale score in the affected leg(s) was <25 (of 100). The treatment types these patients received were analyzed.

Results: Among 283 patients, 26 (9.2%) had an early-onset leg pain event. The majority of these events resolved (20/26, 76.9%). Of those resolving, 55% (11/20) did so within 3 months. Most patients received at least 1 drug treatment for leg pain (92.3%). Of those receiving drug therapy, the most common type was neurogenic (61.5%), followed by narcotics (46.2%). Steroid use was prescribed in 30.8%. The majority of resolved cases were not on narcotics and resolved with neurogenic drugs. Three patients went on to have surgery, none of whom benefited from it. Age, body mass index, and baseline disability scores were predictive of time to resolution.

Conclusion: Early-onset postoperative leg pain occurred in approximately 10% of lumbar TDR patients. The majority of events resolved, often within 3 months. Treatment with conservative care, including medication(s), was more effective in resolving symptoms rather than surgery.

Clinical Relevance: This study provides useful information for providers and patients on the incidence, treatment, and resolution of leg pain with onset after lumbar TDR and not related to direct neural compression identified by imaging.

Level Of Evidence: 2.

References

Strube P, Hoff E, Schurings M, Schmidt H, Dreischarf M, Rohlmann A . Parameters influencing the outcome after total disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction. Part 2: distraction and posterior translation lead to clinical failure after a mean follow-up of 5 years. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(10):2279-87. PMC: 3804712. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2967-2. View

Rigoard P, Blond S, David R, Mertens P . Pathophysiological characterisation of back pain generators in failed back surgery syndrome (part B). Neurochirurgie. 2014; 61 Suppl 1:S35-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.10.104. View

De Andres J, Van Buyten J . Neural modulation by stimulation. Pain Pract. 2007; 6(1):39-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2006.00057.x. View

Yue J, Garcia R, Blumenthal S, Coric D, Patel V, Dinh D . Five-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial for Lumbar Artificial Discs in Single-level Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44(24):1685-1696. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003171. View

Bokov A, Isrelov A, Skorodumov A, Aleynik A, Simonov A, Mlyavykh S . An analysis of reasons for failed back surgery syndrome and partial results after different types of surgical lumbar nerve root decompression. Pain Physician. 2011; 14(6):545-57. View

Garcia Jr R, Yue J, Blumenthal S, Coric D, Patel V, Leary S . Lumbar Total Disc Replacement for Discogenic Low Back Pain: Two-year Outcomes of the activL Multicenter Randomized Controlled IDE Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(24):1873-81. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001245. View

Benyamin R, Trescot A, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N . Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008; 11(2 Suppl):S105-20. View

Gilron I, Baron R, Jensen T . Neuropathic pain: principles of diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90(4):532-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.01.018. View

Braxton Jr E, Wohlfeld B, Blumenthal S, Bozzio A, Buttermann G, Guyer R . Postoperative Care Pathways Following Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Results of a Modified Delphi Approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44 Suppl 24:S1-S12. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003276. View

10.

Zigler J, Gornet M, Ferko N, Cameron C, Schranck F, Patel L . Comparison of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement With Surgical Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Degenerative Disc Disease: A Meta-Analysis of 5-Year Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials. Global Spine J. 2018; 8(4):413-423. PMC: 6022955. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217737317. View

11.

Zigler J, Delamarter R . Five-year results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of single-level.... J Neurosurg Spine. 2012; 17(6):493-501. DOI: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE11498. View

12.

Gornet M, Kenneth Burkus J, Dryer R, Peloza J, Schranck F, Copay A . Lumbar disc arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year outcomes for patients in the Maverick disc investigational device exemption study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 31(3):347-356. DOI: 10.3171/2019.2.SPINE181037. View

13.

Guyer R, Pettine K, Roh J, Dimmig T, Coric D, McAfee P . Five-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Lumbar Total Disc Replacements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 41(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001168. View

14.

Baber Z, Erdek M . Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 2016; 9:979-987. PMC: 5106227. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S92776. View

15.

Vieli M, Staartjes V, Eversdjik H, de Wispelaere M, Oosterhuis J, Schroder M . Safety and Efficacy of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Discogenic Chronic Low Back Pain in a Short-stay Setting: Data From a Prospective Registry. Cureus. 2019; 11(8):e5332. PMC: 6777969. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5332. View

16.

Nielsen R . Adjuvant analgesics for spine surgery. Dan Med J. 2018; 65(3). View

17.

McAfee P, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer R . A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and.... Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(14):1576-83. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170561.25636.1c. View

18.

Blumenthal S, Guyer R, Zigler J, Ohnmeiss D . Impact of previous lumbar spine surgery on the outcome of lumbar total disc replacement: analysis of prospective 5-year follow-up study data. Eur Spine J. 2022; 32(3):797-802. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07492-5. View

19.

Blumenthal S, McAfee P, Guyer R, Hochschuler S, Geisler F, Holt R . A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(14):1565-75. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170587.32676.0e. View

20.

Walker C, Farber S, Cole T, Xu D, Godzik J, Whiting A . Complications for minimally invasive lateral interbody arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing prepsoas and transpsoas approaches. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 30(4):446-460. DOI: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18800. View