» Articles » PMID: 15148462

Low Back Pain in Australian Adults: Prevalence and Associated Disability

Overview
Date 2004 May 19
PMID 15148462
Citations 92
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence ranges of low back pain (LBP) together with any related disability in Australian adults.

Design: A population-based survey.

Methods: The survey was mailed in June 2001 to a stratified random sample of 3000 Australian adults selected from the Electoral Roll. Demographic variables of respondents were compared with the Australian population. Selective response bias was investigated using wave analysis. A range of prevalence data was derived, as were disability scores using the Chronic Pain Grade.

Results: There was a 69% response rate. There was little variation between the sample and the Australian adult population. There was no significant selective response bias found. The sample point prevalence was estimated at 25.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.6-27.5), 12-month prevalence was 67.6% (95% CI, 65.5-69.7), and lifetime prevalence was 79.2%, (95% CI, 77.3-81.0). In the previous 6-month period, 42.6% (95% CI, 40.4-44.8) of the adult population had experienced low-intensity pain and low disability from it. Another 10.9% (95% CI, 9.6-12.3) had experienced high intensity-pain but still low disability from this pain. However, 10.5% (95% CI, 9.2-11.9) had experienced high-disability LBP.

Conclusion: LBP is a common problem in the Australian adult population, yet most of this is low-intensity and low-disability pain. Nevertheless, over 10% had been significantly disabled by LBP in the past 6 months. Data from this study will provide a better understanding of the magnitude of the LBP problem in Australia, the need for access to health care resources, and also strategic research directions.

Citing Articles

Contemporary clinical perspectives on chronic low back pain: The biology, mechanics, etc. underpinning clinical and radiological evaluation.

Sima S, Diwan A JOR Spine. 2025; 8(1):e70021.

PMID: 39867670 PMC: 11757297. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70021.


Is Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Clinically Superior to Sham or Placebo for Patients with Neck or Low-Back Pain? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Ceballos-Laita L, Jimenez-Del-Barrio S, Carrasco-Uribarren A, Medrano-de-la-Fuente R, Robles-Perez R, Ernst E Diseases. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39589961 PMC: 11593019. DOI: 10.3390/diseases12110287.


The Roles of Depression, Life Control and Affective Distress on Treatment Attendance and Perceived Disability in Chronic Back Pain Sufferers throughout the Duration of the Condition.

Oraison H, Loton D, Kennedy G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(19).

PMID: 37835118 PMC: 10572183. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20196844.


Arabic version of the Extended Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing.

Al Amer H, Alharbi A J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):672.

PMID: 37697294 PMC: 10494343. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04161-1.


Burden of disease and impact on quality of life in chronic back pain - a comparative cross-sectional study of 150 axial spondyloarthritis and 150 orthopedic back pain patients.

Frede N, Hiestand S, Endres D, Tebartz van Elst L, Finzel S, Chevalier N Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1221087.

PMID: 37663655 PMC: 10469952. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1221087.