» Articles » PMID: 29955223

Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes: Industry Response and Tactics

Overview
Journal Yale J Biol Med
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Jun 30
PMID 29955223
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The consumption of sugary beverages (SBs) has increasingly grown in many countries and is a significant contributor to the rise in obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). In response, public health officials in multiple countries have pushed for implementing a tax on SBs in order to reduce their consumption. Today, many individuals, especially those of lower socioeconomic status, live in environments in which unhealthy foods and drinks are more accessible than healthier ones. The beverage industry has greatly contributed to the formation of these "obesogenic" environments through their extensive advertising activities and effective marketing strategies. With rising public awareness of sugar's link to obesity, the industry has heavily invested in campaigns that seek to shift the blame away from their products and has aggressively opposed legislative efforts to pass an SB tax. This perspective will focus on explaining the rationale and necessity of an SB tax by highlighting the tactics the beverage industry has employed that have contributed to the formation and maintenance of the present unhealthy food environment.

Citing Articles

Making food-related health taxes palatable in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons from Ghana.

Laar A, Amoah J, Massawudu L, Pereko K, Yeboah-Nkrumah A, Amevinya G BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(Suppl 8).

PMID: 37813441 PMC: 10565179. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012154.


Pro- and Anti-Tax Framing in News Articles About California Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Campaigns from 2014-2018.

Garcia K, Mejia P, Perez-Sanz S, Dorfman L, Madsen K, Schillinger D J Health Commun. 2023; 28(10):658-668.

PMID: 37682070 PMC: 10592108. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2251913.


Gaps and priorities in assessment of food environments for children and adolescents in low- and middle-income countries.

Carducci B, Oh C, Roth D, Neufeld L, Frongillo E, LAbbe M Nat Food. 2023; 2(6):396-403.

PMID: 37118231 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00299-5.


Reactions of industry and associated organisations to the announcement of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: longitudinal thematic analysis of UK media articles, 2016-18.

Penney T, Jones C, Pell D, Cummins S, Adams J, Forde H BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):280.

PMID: 36750834 PMC: 9906897. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15190-0.


Stakeholder arguments during the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax in South Africa and their influence: a content analysis.

Abdool Karim S, Kruger P, Mazonde N, Erzse A, Goldstein S, Hofman K Glob Health Action. 2022; 16(1):2152638.

PMID: 36508172 PMC: 9754008. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2152638.


References
1.
Blecher E, Liber A, Drope J, Nguyen B, Stoklosa M . Global Trends in the Affordability of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, 1990-2016. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017; 14:E37. PMC: 5420443. DOI: 10.5888/pcd14.160406. View

2.
Woodward-Lopez G, Kao J, Ritchie L . To what extent have sweetened beverages contributed to the obesity epidemic?. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 14(3):499-509. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010002375. View

3.
Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J . Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ. 2013; 346:e7492. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e7492. View

4.
Malik V, Popkin B, Bray G, Despres J, Willett W, Hu F . Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(11):2477-83. PMC: 2963518. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1079. View

5.
Silver L, Ng S, Ryan-Ibarra S, Smith Taillie L, Induni M, Miles D . Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study. PLoS Med. 2017; 14(4):e1002283. PMC: 5395172. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. View