» Articles » PMID: 34315428

Sugar Sweetened Beverages Attributable Disease Burden and the Potential Impact of Policy Interventions: a Systematic Review of Epidemiological and Decision Models

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Jul 28
PMID 34315428
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Around 184,000 deaths per year could be attributable to sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption worldwide. Epidemiological and decision models are important tools to estimate disease burden. The purpose of this study was to identify models to assess the burden of diseases attributable to SSBs consumption or the potential impact of health interventions.

Methods: We carried out a systematic review and literature search up to August 2018. Pairs of reviewers independently selected, extracted, and assessed the quality of the included studies through an exhaustive description of each model's features. Discrepancies were solved by consensus. The inclusion criteria were epidemiological or decision models evaluating SSBs health interventions or policies, and descriptive SSBs studies of decision models. Studies published before 2003, cost of illness studies and economic evaluations based on individual patient data were excluded.

Results: We identified a total of 2766 references. Out of the 40 included studies, 45% were models specifically developed to address SSBs, 82.5% were conducted in high-income countries and 57.5% considered a health system perspective. The most common model's outcomes were obesity/overweight (82.5%), diabetes (72.5%), cardiovascular disease (60%), mortality (52.5%), direct medical costs (57.35%), and healthy years -DALYs/QALYs- (40%) attributable to SSBs. 67.5% of the studies modelled the effect of SSBs on the outcomes either entirely through BMI or through BMI plus diabetes independently. Models were usually populated with inputs from national surveys -such us obesity prevalence, SSBs consumption-; and vital statistics (67.5%). Only 55% reported results by gender and 40% included children; 30% presented results by income level, and 25% by selected vulnerable groups. Most of the models evaluated at least one policy intervention to reduce SSBs consumption (92.5%), taxes being the most frequent strategy (75%).

Conclusions: There is a wide range of modelling approaches of different complexity and information requirements to evaluate the burden of disease attributable to SSBs. Most of them take into account the impact on obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, mortality, and economic impact. Incorporating these tools to different countries could result in useful information for decision makers and the general population to promote a deeper implementation of policies to reduce SSBs consumption.

Prospero Protocol Number: CRD42020121025 .

Citing Articles

Every bite counts to achieve oral health: a scoping review on diet and oral health preventive practices.

Chamut S, Alhassan M, Hameedaldeen A, Kaplish S, Yang A, Wade C Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):261.

PMID: 39623427 PMC: 11613938. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02279-0.


The effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on energy and macronutrients intake in adults: a grade-assessed systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Rostampour K, Moghtaderi F, Najafi A, Seyedjafari B, Salehi-Abargouei A Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1475962.

PMID: 39606579 PMC: 11598426. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1475962.


Redesigning Pharmacy to Improve Public Health Outcomes: Expanding Retail Spaces for Digital Therapeutics to Replace Consumer Products That Increase Mortality and Morbidity Risks.

Bulaj G, Coleman M, Johansen B, Kraft S, Lam W, Phillips K Pharmacy (Basel). 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 39051391 PMC: 11270305. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy12040107.


U.S. food policy to address diet-related chronic disease.

Matthews E, Kurnat-Thoma E Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1339859.

PMID: 38827626 PMC: 11141542. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339859.


Place of Residence Is Associated with Dietary Intake and BMI-SDS in Children and Adolescents: Findings from the DONALD Cohort Study.

Klemm J, Perrar I, Borgemeister C, Alexy U, Nothlings U Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(1).

PMID: 38248511 PMC: 10815849. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010046.


References
1.
Backholer K, Sarink D, Beauchamp A, Keating C, Loh V, Ball K . The impact of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages according to socio-economic position: a systematic review of the evidence. Public Health Nutr. 2016; 19(17):3070-3084. PMC: 10270974. DOI: 10.1017/S136898001600104X. View

2.
Afshin A, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Fahimi S, Shi P, Powles J . The impact of dietary habits and metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular and diabetes mortality in countries of the Middle East and North Africa in 2010: a comparative risk assessment analysis. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(5):e006385. PMC: 4442236. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006385. View

3.
Manyema M, Veerman J, Chola L, Tugendhaft A, Labadarios D, Hofman K . Decreasing the Burden of Type 2 Diabetes in South Africa: The Impact of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0143050. PMC: 4648571. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143050. View

4.
Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V . Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2095-128. PMC: 10790329. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. View

5.
Bridge G, Lomazzi M, Bedi R . Implementation of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations for policymakers. J Public Health Policy. 2019; 41(1):84-97. DOI: 10.1057/s41271-019-00196-z. View