» Articles » PMID: 29945914

An Algorithm Based on Deep Learning for Predicting In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Overview
Date 2018 Jun 28
PMID 29945914
Citations 104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest is a major burden to public health, which affects patient safety. Although traditional track-and-trigger systems are used to predict cardiac arrest early, they have limitations, with low sensitivity and high false-alarm rates. We propose a deep learning-based early warning system that shows higher performance than the existing track-and-trigger systems.

Methods And Results: This retrospective cohort study reviewed patients who were admitted to 2 hospitals from June 2010 to July 2017. A total of 52 131 patients were included. Specifically, a recurrent neural network was trained using data from June 2010 to January 2017. The result was tested using the data from February to July 2017. The primary outcome was cardiac arrest, and the secondary outcome was death without attempted resuscitation. As comparative measures, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and the net reclassification index. Furthermore, we evaluated sensitivity while varying the number of alarms. The deep learning-based early warning system (AUROC: 0.850; AUPRC: 0.044) significantly outperformed a modified early warning score (AUROC: 0.603; AUPRC: 0.003), a random forest algorithm (AUROC: 0.780; AUPRC: 0.014), and logistic regression (AUROC: 0.613; AUPRC: 0.007). Furthermore, the deep learning-based early warning system reduced the number of alarms by 82.2%, 13.5%, and 42.1% compared with the modified early warning system, random forest, and logistic regression, respectively, at the same sensitivity.

Conclusions: An algorithm based on deep learning had high sensitivity and a low false-alarm rate for detection of patients with cardiac arrest in the multicenter study.

Citing Articles

Factors underpinning the performance of implemented artificial intelligence-based patient deterioration prediction systems: reasons for selection and implications for hospitals and researchers.

van der Vegt A, Campbell V, Wang S, Malycha J, Scott I J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025; 32(3):492-509.

PMID: 39963969 PMC: 11833469. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae321.


Enhancing Clinical Cardiac Care: Predicting In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Machine Learning.

Kim S Ann Lab Med. 2025; 45(2):117-120.

PMID: 39774133 PMC: 11788704. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2024.0696.


A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Using Single-Day Vital Signs, Laboratory Test Results, and International Classification of Disease-10 Block for Diagnosis.

Park H, Park C Ann Lab Med. 2024; 45(2):209-217.

PMID: 39668659 PMC: 11788698. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2024.0315.


Application of multi-feature-based machine learning models to predict neurological outcomes of cardiac arrest.

Ni P, Zhang S, Hu W, Diao M Resusc Plus. 2024; 20:100829.

PMID: 39639943 PMC: 11617783. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100829.


Deep learning-based Emergency Department In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Score (Deep EDICAS) for early prediction of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department.

Deng Y, Wang J, Ko C, Huang C, Tsai C, Fu L BioData Min. 2024; 17(1):52.

PMID: 39580434 PMC: 11585162. DOI: 10.1186/s13040-024-00407-8.


References
1.
Subbe C, Davies R, Williams E, Rutherford P, Gemmell L . Effect of introducing the Modified Early Warning score on clinical outcomes, cardio-pulmonary arrests and intensive care utilisation in acute medical admissions. Anaesthesia. 2003; 58(8):797-802. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03258.x. View

2.
Franklin C, Mathew J . Developing strategies to prevent inhospital cardiac arrest: analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event. Crit Care Med. 1994; 22(2):244-7. View

3.
Deo R . Machine Learning in Medicine. Circulation. 2015; 132(20):1920-30. PMC: 5831252. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593. View

4.
DeVita M, Smith G, Adam S, Adams-Pizarro I, Buist M, Bellomo R . "Identifying the hospitalised patient in crisis"--a consensus conference on the afferent limb of rapid response systems. Resuscitation. 2010; 81(4):375-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.008. View

5.
Mozaffarian D, Benjamin E, Go A, Arnett D, Blaha M, Cushman M . Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014; 131(4):e29-322. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. View