» Articles » PMID: 29940977

The 2017 Dutch Physical Activity Guidelines

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to derive evidence-based physical activity guidelines for the general Dutch population.

Methods: Two systematic reviews were conducted of English language meta-analyses in PubMed summarizing separately randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies on the relation between physical activity and sedentary behaviour on the one hand and the risk of all-cause mortality and incidence of 15 major chronic diseases and conditions on the other hand. Other outcome measures were risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, physical functioning, and fitness. On the basis of these reviews, an expert committee derived physical activity guidelines. In deriving the guidelines, the committee first selected only experimental and observational prospective findings with a strong level of evidence and then integrated both lines of evidence.

Results: The evidence found for beneficial effects on a large number of the outcome measures was sufficiently strong to draw up guidelines to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour, respectively. At the same time, the current evidence did not provide a sufficient basis for quantifying how much physical activity is minimally needed to achieve beneficial health effects, or at what amount sedentary behaviour becomes detrimental. A general tenet was that at every level of current activity, further increases in physical activity provide additional health benefits, with relatively larger effects among those who are currently not active or active only at light intensity. Three specific guidelines on (1) moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity, (2) bone- and muscle-strengthening activities, and (3) sedentary behaviour were formulated separately for adults and children.

Conclusions: There is an unabated need for evidence-based physical activity guidelines that can guide public health policies. Research in which physical activity is measured both objectively (quantity) and subjectively (type and quality) is needed to provide better estimates of the type and actual amount of physical activity required for health.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Acceptance of Just-in-Time Adaptive Lifestyle Support for People With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Acceptability Study.

Hietbrink E, Middelweerd A, dHollosy W, Schrijver L, Laverman G, Vollenbroek-Hutten M JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e65026.

PMID: 39969969 PMC: 11888104. DOI: 10.2196/65026.


High-intensive physical rehabilitation approach in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury during subacute phase (REHABILITY): a feasibility study protocol.

Gmelig Meyling C, Verschuren O, Rentinck I, van der Steen I, Engelbert R, Gorter J BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e087768.

PMID: 39832989 PMC: 11751975. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087768.


Tai chi improves balance performance in healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cui Z, Xiong J, Li Z, Yang C Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1443168.

PMID: 39588165 PMC: 11586773. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443168.


Disparities in management of symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a nationwide multidisciplinary survey.

Weber A, Vercoulen T, Jacobs E, Buizer A, Bours S, van den Bergh J Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):101.

PMID: 39441383 PMC: 11499376. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01454-8.


Effect of a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention on body composition in people with osteoarthritis: Secondary analysis of the "Plants for Joints" randomized controlled trial.

Wagenaar C, Walrabenstein W, de Jonge C, Bisschops M, van der Leeden M, van der Esch M Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024; 6(4):100524.

PMID: 39435357 PMC: 11491948. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100524.


References
1.
Naci H, Ioannidis J . Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study. BMJ. 2014; 347:f5577. PMC: 3788175. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f5577. View

2.
Pan X, Li G, Hu Y, Wang J, Yang W, An Z . Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20(4):537-44. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.537. View

3.
Sattelmair J, Pertman J, Ding E, Kohl 3rd H, Haskell W, Lee I . Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2011; 124(7):789-95. PMC: 3158733. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010710. View

4.
Robsahm T, Aagnes B, Hjartaker A, Langseth H, Bray F, Larsen I . Body mass index, physical activity, and colorectal cancer by anatomical subsites: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2013; 22(6):492-505. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328360f434. View

5.
Helmerhorst H, Brage S, Warren J, Besson H, Ekelund U . A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:103. PMC: 3492158. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-103. View