Disparities in Management of Symptomatic Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: a Nationwide Multidisciplinary Survey

Overview

Journal Arch Osteoporos

Publisher Springer

Date 2024 Oct 23

PMID 39441383

Authors

A Weber

T F G Vercoulen

E Jacobs

A T Buizer

S P G Bours

J P van den Bergh

R M Jeuken

S M J Van Kuijk

S M A A Evers

P C Willems

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: This survey aims to assess current preferred care practices for symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in the Netherlands, focusing on guideline adherence, identifying knowledge gaps, and clarifying consensus and collaboration across medical disciplines in OVCF treatment.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted via Qualtrics (Provo, UT) using a self-administered online survey distributed to 238 general practitioners and physicians in orthopedics, traumatology, internal medicine, rheumatology, and geriatrics working at 51 hospitals in the Netherlands. The survey, conducted in Dutch, included 36 multiple-choice and two open questions and was accessible via an anonymous email link or QR code. General practitioners received additional questions specific to their role. Data was anonymized, stored securely, and analyzed using descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel and SPSS (Version 24). Open-ended responses were coded and categorized. The survey was conducted prior to the publication of the updated Federation of Medical Specialists guidelines in 2024.

Results: Physicians across various disciplines uniformly expressed dissatisfaction with current OVCF care. The survey highlighted significant disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up practices. A lack of communication between primary and secondary care providers and differing guidelines further complicate OVCF management. These issues point to considerable variation in clinical practice and gaps in interdisciplinary collaboration.

Conclusion: Addressing the identified issues requires fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and creating cohesive care strategies. Ensuring access to diagnostic resources in both primary and secondary care and establishing coordinated care models promises more structured and standardized treatment. These steps are crucial for enhancing patient outcomes in OVCF management.

Citing Articles

Predicting residual pain after vertebral augmentation in vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and critical appraisal of risk prediction models.

Wang S, Shi M, Zhou X, Yu J, Han M, Zhang X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):87.

PMID: 39871243 PMC: 11773721. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08338-z.

Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum: Novel Insights into Diagnostics and Treatment.

Baumann F, Herrmann-Johns A, Alt V, Freigang V J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685674 PMC: 11642404. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237215.

References

Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J . Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations.... Arch Osteoporos. 2013; 8:136. PMC: 3880487. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1. View

Kanis J, Norton N, Harvey N, Jacobson T, Johansson H, Lorentzon M . SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos. 2021; 16(1):82. PMC: 8172408. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-020-00871-9. View

Willers C, Norton N, Harvey N, Jacobson T, Johansson H, Lorentzon M . Osteoporosis in Europe: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos. 2022; 17(1):23. PMC: 8789736. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00969-8. View

Sozen T, Ozisik L, Calik Basaran N . An overview and management of osteoporosis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2017; 4(1):46-56. PMC: 5335887. DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2016.048. View

Sattui S, Saag K . Fracture mortality: associations with epidemiology and osteoporosis treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014; 10(10):592-602. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.125. View

Rizkallah M, Bachour F, Khoury M, Sebaaly A, Finianos B, El Hage R . Comparison of morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures: Which one has the highest burden?. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2020; 6(3):146-150. PMC: 7573502. DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2020.07.002. View

Colon-Emeric C, Saag K . Osteoporotic fractures in older adults. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006; 20(4):695-706. PMC: 1839833. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2006.04.004. View

Lindsay R, Silverman S, Cooper C, Hanley D, Barton I, Broy S . Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001; 285(3):320-3. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.3.320. View

Leslie W, Schousboe J . A review of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment options in new and recently updated guidelines on case finding around the world. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2011; 9(3):129-40. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-011-0060-5. View

10.

McCloskey E, Rathi J, Heijmans S, Blagden M, Cortet B, Czerwinski E . The osteoporosis treatment gap in patients at risk of fracture in European primary care: a multi-country cross-sectional observational study. Osteoporos Int. 2020; 32(2):251-259. PMC: 7838133. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05557-z. View

11.

Kanis J, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster J . European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 30(1):3-44. PMC: 7026233. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5. View

12.

van den Bergh J, Geusens P, Appelman-Dijkstra N, van den Broek H, Elders P, De Klerk G . The Dutch multidisciplinary guideline osteoporosis and fracture prevention, taking a local guideline to the international arena. Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):23. PMC: 10987374. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01378-3. View

13.

Esses S, McGuire R, Jenkins J, Finkelstein J, Woodard E, Watters 3rd W . The treatment of symptomatic osteoporotic spinal compression fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011; 19(3):176-82. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201103000-00007. View

14.

Schnake K, Blattert T, Hahn P, Franck A, Hartmann F, Ullrich B . Classification of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU). Global Spine J. 2018; 8(2 Suppl):46S-49S. PMC: 6130101. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217717972. View

15.

Vaccaro A, Oner C, Kepler C, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C . AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(23):2028-37. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8a381. View

16.

Mitchell R, Jewell P, Javaid M, McKean D, Ostlere S . Reporting of vertebral fragility fractures: can radiologists help reduce the number of hip fractures?. Arch Osteoporos. 2017; 12(1):71. PMC: 5547187. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0363-y. View

17.

Davy S, Bergin D . Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on standard imaging performed for alternative indications. BJR Open. 2022; 3(1):20210053. PMC: 9185849. DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20210053. View

18.

Panda A, Das C, Baruah U . Imaging of vertebral fractures. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 18(3):295-303. PMC: 4056125. DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.131140. View

19.

Link T, Guglielmi G, van Kuijk C, Adams J . Radiologic assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: diagnostic and prognostic implications. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15(8):1521-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2773-2. View

20.

McGowan S, Ramski D, Homcha B, Sokunbi G . Are CT Scans Overutilized in the Workup of Vertebral Compression Fractures?. Clin Spine Surg. 2019; 32(4):166-169. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000816. View