» Articles » PMID: 29920512

Systems Modelling of the EGFR-PYK2-c-Met Interaction Network Predicts and Prioritizes Synergistic Drug Combinations for Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Jun 20
PMID 29920512
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prediction of drug combinations that effectively target cancer cells is a critical challenge for cancer therapy, in particular for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive breast cancer subtype with no effective targeted treatment. As signalling pathway networks critically control cancer cell behaviour, analysis of signalling network activity and crosstalk can help predict potent drug combinations and rational stratification of patients, thus bringing therapeutic and prognostic values. We have previously showed that the non-receptor tyrosine kinase PYK2 is a downstream effector of EGFR and c-Met and demonstrated their crosstalk signalling in basal-like TNBC. Here we applied a systems modelling approach and developed a mechanistic model of the integrated EGFR-PYK2-c-Met signalling network to identify and prioritize potent drug combinations for TNBC. Model predictions validated by experimental data revealed that among six potential combinations of drug pairs targeting the central nodes of the network, including EGFR, c-Met, PYK2 and STAT3, co-targeting of EGFR and PYK2 and to a lesser extent of EGFR and c-Met yielded strongest synergistic effect. Importantly, the synergy in co-targeting EGFR and PYK2 was linked to switch-like cell proliferation-associated responses. Moreover, simulations of patient-specific models using public gene expression data of TNBC patients led to predictive stratification of patients into subgroups displaying distinct susceptibility to specific drug combinations. These results suggest that mechanistic systems modelling is a powerful approach for the rational design, prediction and prioritization of potent combination therapies for individual patients, thus providing a concrete step towards personalized treatment for TNBC and other tumour types.

Citing Articles

Integrative modeling and analysis of signaling crosstalk reveal molecular switches coordinating Yes-associated protein transcriptional activities.

Ghomlaghi M, Theocharous M, Hoang N, Shin S, von Kriegsheim A, Neill E iScience. 2024; 27(3):109031.

PMID: 38380257 PMC: 10877689. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109031.


Integrative modeling uncovers p21-driven drug resistance and prioritizes therapies for PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer.

Yip H, Shin S, Chee A, Ang C, Rossello F, Wong L NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024; 8(1):20.

PMID: 38273040 PMC: 10810864. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00496-y.


SynDISCO: A Mechanistic Modeling-Based Framework for Predictive Prioritization of Synergistic Drug Combinations Targeting Cell Signalling Networks.

Shin S, Nguyen L Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2634:357-381.

PMID: 37074588 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3008-2_17.


Integrative applications of network pharmacology and molecular docking: An herbal formula ameliorates H9c2 cells injury through pyroptosis.

Qi Z, Yan Z, Wang Y, Ji N, Yang X, Zhang A J Ginseng Res. 2023; 47(2):228-236.

PMID: 36926601 PMC: 10014185. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2022.03.003.


Role of Patient-Derived Models of Cancer in Translational Oncology.

Idrisova K, Simon H, Gomzikova M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(1).

PMID: 36612135 PMC: 9817860. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010139.


References
1.
Verma Y, Gangenahalli G, Singh V, Gupta P, Chandra R, Sharma R . Cell death regulation by B-cell lymphoma protein. Apoptosis. 2006; 11(4):459-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10495-006-5702-1. View

2.
Nguyen L, Kholodenko B . Feedback regulation in cell signalling: Lessons for cancer therapeutics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015; 50:85-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.09.024. View

3.
Miller M, Molinelli E, Nair J, Sheikh T, Samy R, Jing X . Drug synergy screen and network modeling in dedifferentiated liposarcoma identifies CDK4 and IGF1R as synergistic drug targets. Sci Signal. 2013; 6(294):ra85. PMC: 4000046. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2004014. View

4.
Nakai K, Hung M, Yamaguchi H . A perspective on anti-EGFR therapies targeting triple-negative breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2016; 6(8):1609-23. PMC: 5004067. View

5.
Yi Y, You K, Bae E, Kwak S, Seong Y, Bae I . Dual inhibition of EGFR and MET induces synthetic lethality in triple-negative breast cancer cells through downregulation of ribosomal protein S6. Int J Oncol. 2015; 47(1):122-32. PMC: 4735702. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2982. View