» Articles » PMID: 29783933

Enablers and Barriers to Physical Activity in Overweight and Obese Pregnant Women: an Analysis Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B Model

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 May 23
PMID 29783933
Citations 70
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Obesity during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and other complications. Physical activity is a modifiable lifestyle factor that may help to prevent these complications but many women reduce their physical activity levels during pregnancy. Interventions targeting physical activity in pregnancy are on-going but few identify the underlying behaviour change mechanisms by which the intervention is expected to work. To enhance intervention effectiveness, recent tools in behavioural science such as the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM-B model (capability, opportunity, motivation and behaviour) have been employed to understand behaviours for intervention development. Using these behaviour change methods, this study aimed to identify the enablers and barriers to physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of overweight and obese women at different stages of pregnancy attending a public antenatal clinic in a large academic maternity hospital in Cork, Ireland. Interviews were recorded and transcribed into NVivo V.10 software. Data analysis followed the framework approach, drawing on the TDF and the COM-B model.

Results: Twenty one themes were identified and these mapped directly on to the COM-B model of behaviour change and ten of the TDF domains. Having the social opportunity to engage in physical activity was identified as an enabler; pregnant women suggested being active was easier when supported by their partners. Knowledge was a commonly reported barrier with women lacking information on safe activities during pregnancy and describing the information received from their midwife as 'limited'. Having the physical capability and physical opportunity to carry out physical activity were also identified as barriers; experiencing pain, a lack of time, having other children, and working prevented women from being active.

Conclusion: A wide range of barriers and enablers were identified which influenced women's capability, motivation and opportunity to engage in physical activity with "knowledge" as the most commonly reported barrier. This study is a theoretical starting point in making a 'behavioural diagnoses' and the results will be used to inform the development of an intervention to increase physical activity levels among overweight and obese pregnant women.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Realm of Physical Activity in Pregnant Indian Women: Understanding Their Knowledge, Practice, and Obstacles.

Singh S, Agarwal M, Singh P, Prasad I Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e76881.

PMID: 39901996 PMC: 11788225. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76881.


Predictors of physical activity among pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Hove A, Sithambuli E, Ncube W, Doyce S, Mukwekwe S, Mapuranga T PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025; 5(1):e0003470.

PMID: 39761263 PMC: 11703015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003470.


Evaluation of the mediating role of physical activity self-efficacy in the relationship between knowledge, social support, and physical activity in pregnant women with a high risk for gestational diabetes.

Chen L, Han R, Chen X, Fu B, Nogueira B, Gao L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):857.

PMID: 39716107 PMC: 11668007. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07068-9.


A Call for the Implementation of Physical Activity as a Vital Sign (PAVS) During Pregnancy.

Sparks J, Ruiz-Ramie J, Kishman E, Wang X Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024; :15598276241295993.

PMID: 39540165 PMC: 11556583. DOI: 10.1177/15598276241295993.


Barriers, Facilitators, and Requirements for a Telerehabilitation Aftercare Program for Patients After Occupational Injuries: Semistructured Interviews With Key Stakeholders.

Lange-Drenth L, Schulz H, Suck I, Bleich C JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e51865.

PMID: 39514260 PMC: 11584548. DOI: 10.2196/51865.


References
1.
Cadogan S, McHugh S, Bradley C, Browne J, Cahill M . General practitioner views on the determinants of test ordering: a theory-based qualitative approach to the development of an intervention to improve immunoglobulin requests in primary care. Implement Sci. 2016; 11(1):102. PMC: 4952272. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0465-8. View

2.
Harrison C, Lombard C, Strauss B, Teede H . Optimizing healthy gestational weight gain in women at high risk of gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 21(5):904-9. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20163. View

3.
McSherry L, Dombrowski S, Francis J, Murphy J, Martin C, OLeary J . 'It's a can of worms': understanding primary care practitioners' behaviours in relation to HPV using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012; 7:73. PMC: 3523072. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-73. View

4.
Bogaerts A, Devlieger R, Nuyts E, Witters I, Gyselaers W, Van den Bergh B . Effects of lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women on gestational weight gain and mental health: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012; 37(6):814-21. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2012.162. View

5.
Hill B, Skouteris H, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M . Interventions designed to limit gestational weight gain: a systematic review of theory and meta-analysis of intervention components. Obes Rev. 2013; 14(6):435-50. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12022. View