» Articles » PMID: 39716107

Evaluation of the Mediating Role of Physical Activity Self-efficacy in the Relationship Between Knowledge, Social Support, and Physical Activity in Pregnant Women with a High Risk for Gestational Diabetes

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Dec 23
PMID 39716107
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the associations between knowledge, social support, and physical activity and explore the mediating role of physical activity self-efficacy in pregnant women with a high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Guangzhou, China, from July 2022 to May 2023. Five hundred thirty-seven pregnant women with a high risk for GDM completed the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire, Pregnancy Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale, Pregnancy Physical Activity Knowledge Scale, Physical Activity Social Support Scale, and a socio-demographic data sheet. The mediation effect was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) and the bootstrap method.

Results: 42.5% of pregnant women did not meet the current physical activity guidelines. Physical activity self-efficacy (β, 0.16; P<0.001), knowledge (β, 0.15; P = 0.001), social support (β, 0.10; P = 0.019), education, and type of conception were predictors of physical activity. The SEM results found that physical activity self-efficacy mediated the association between physical activity and knowledge (β, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.32) and social support (β, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.39). The data fit of the model (RMSEA = 0.067, CFI = 0.851, TLI = 0.828, χ/df = 3.440) was acceptable.

Conclusion: This study found that the prevalence of being physically inactive was high in pregnant women with a high risk for GDM. The present study's findings suggested that healthcare providers should try to enhance physical activity self-efficacy, knowledge, and social support of pregnant women with a high risk for GDM to improve their physical activity with a focus on physical activity self-efficacy.

References
1.
Bland H, Melton B, Marshall E, Nagle J . Measuring exercise self-efficacy in pregnant women: psychometric properties of the pregnancy-exercise self-efficacy scale (P-ESES). J Nurs Meas. 2014; 21(3):349-59. DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.21.3.349. View

2.
Bauman A, Sallis J, Dzewaltowski D, Owen N . Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: the role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 23(2 Suppl):5-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00469-5. View

3.
Verloigne M, Cardon G, De Craemer M, DHaese S, De Bourdeaudhuij I . Mediating Effects of Self-Efficacy, Benefits and Barriers on the Association between Peer and Parental Factors and Physical Activity among Adolescent Girls with a Lower Educational Level. PLoS One. 2016; 11(6):e0157216. PMC: 4911140. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157216. View

4.
Sjogren Forss K, Stjernberg L . Physical Activity Patterns Among Women and Men During Pregnancy and 8 Months Postpartum Compared to Pre-pregnancy: A Longitudinal Study. Front Public Health. 2019; 7:294. PMC: 6843064. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00294. View

5.
Flannery C, McHugh S, Anaba A, Clifford E, ORiordan M, Kenny L . Enablers and barriers to physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women: an analysis informed by the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):178. PMC: 5963099. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1816-z. View