» Articles » PMID: 38192385

Can a Mock Medication-taking Learning Activity Enable Pharmacy Students to Experience the Range of Barriers and Facilitators to Medication Adherence? An Analysis Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B Model

Overview
Date 2024 Jan 9
PMID 38192385
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pharmacy professionals are well-placed to provide medication adherence support to patients. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) are two complementary models previously applied to medication-taking behaviour. Understanding the patient-specific barriers and facilitators to adherence using psychological frameworks from the early stages of pharmacy education enables the design and delivery of effective interventions.

Objectives: To examine whether a novel 'mock medicine' learning activity enabled students to experience the range of barriers and facilitators to medication adherence using the COM-B and TDF.

Methods: A mock medicine activity was conducted with students at pharmacy schools in three universities in the UK, Norway, and Australia over one week. Percentage adherence was calculated for five dosing regimens; theoretical framework analysis was applied to map reflective statements from student logs to COM-B and TDF.

Results: A total of 349 students (52.6%) returned completed logs, with high overall mean adherence (83.5%, range 0-100%). Analysis of the 277 (79.4%) students who provided reflective statements included barriers and facilitators that mapped onto one (9%), two (29%) or all three (62%) of the COM-B components and all fourteen TDF domains (overall mean = 4.04; Uni 1 = 3.72; Uni 2 = 4.50; Uni 3 = 4.38; range 1-8). Most frequently mapped domains were '' ( = 199; 72%), '' ( = 186; 67%), '' (184; 66%) and '' ( = 175; 63%).

Conclusions: This is the first study to utilise both COM-B and TDF to analyse a proxy measure of medication adherence in pharmacy education. Data mapping demonstrated that students experienced similar issues to patients when prescribed a short course of medication. Importantly, all the factors influencing medication-taking reported by students were captured by these two psychological frameworks. Future educational strategies will involve students in the mapping exercise to gain hands-on experience of using these psychological constructs in practice.

References
1.
Atkins L, Michie S . Designing interventions to change eating behaviours. Proc Nutr Soc. 2015; 74(2):164-70. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665115000075. View

2.
Thompson L, Diaz-Artiga A, Weinstein J, Handley M . Designing a behavioral intervention using the COM-B model and the theoretical domains framework to promote gas stove use in rural Guatemala: a formative research study. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):253. PMC: 5813324. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5138-x. View

3.
Vrijens B, de Geest S, Hughes D, Przemyslaw K, Demonceau J, Ruppar T . A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 73(5):691-705. PMC: 3403197. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04167.x. View

4.
Conn V, Ruppar T . Medication adherence outcomes of 771 intervention trials: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2017; 99:269-276. PMC: 5467216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.03.008. View

5.
Sinnott C, Mercer S, Payne R, Duerden M, Bradley C, Byrne M . Improving medication management in multimorbidity: development of the MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MY COMRADE) intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:132. PMC: 4582886. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0322-1. View