» Articles » PMID: 29776848

Comparison of Current Methods Used to Detect Cryptosporidium Oocysts in Stools

Overview
Date 2018 May 20
PMID 29776848
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this review all of the methods that are currently in use for the investigation of Cryptosporidium in stool material are highlighted and critically discussed. It appears that more qualifications and background knowledge in this field regarding the diagnosis of the Cryptosporidium parasite is required. Furthermore, there is no standardization for the protocols that are commonly used to either detect oocysts in faeces or to diagnose the Cryptosporidium infection. It is therefore necessary to initiate further education and research that will assist in improving the accuracy of the diagnosis of Cryptosporidium oocysts in the faecal micro-cosmos. Where ambient concentrations of oocysts are low in stool material, detection becomes a formidable task. Procedures for ring tests and the standardization of multi-laboratory testing are recommended. It is also necessary to enhance the routine surveillance capacity of cryptosporidiosis and to improve the safety against it, considering the fact that this disease is under diagnosed and under reported. This review is intended to stimulate research that could lead to future improvements and further developments in monitoring the diagnostic methodologies that will assist in harmonizing Cryptosporidium oocysts in stool diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Genetic diversity of single-celled microorganism sp. and its associated gut microbiome in free-ranging marine mammals from North-Western Mediterranean Sea.

Marangi M, Boughattas S Curr Res Microb Sci. 2025; 8:100349.

PMID: 39926158 PMC: 11803257. DOI: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100349.


Infections in Neonatal Calves on a Dairy Farm.

Kadukova M, Schreiberova A, Mudron P, Tothova C, Gomulec P, Strkolcova G Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39065184 PMC: 11279349. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12071416.


Parallel detection of multiple zoonotic parasites using a real-time fluorogenic loop-mediated isothermal amplification-based quadruple-sample microfluidic chip.

Chen Y, Lou Y, Duan L, Zhou Q, Xu Z, Chen F Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1238376.

PMID: 37822745 PMC: 10562543. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1238376.


Examination of ELISA against PCR for assessing treatment efficacy against Cryptosporidium in a clinical trial context.

Nyirenda J, Henrion M, Nyasulu V, Msakwiza M, Nedi W, Thole H PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0289929.

PMID: 37682856 PMC: 10490871. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289929.


Diagnostic Performance of Toluidine Blue Stain for Direct Wet Mount Detection of Oocysts: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison to the Modified Ziehl-Neelsen Stain.

Ahmed S, Quattrocchi A, Elzagawy S, Karanis P, Gad S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(15).

PMID: 37568920 PMC: 10416936. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152557.