Comparative Evaluation of Various Diagnostic Techniques for Detection of Infection from the Faecal Samples of Diarrhoeic Bovine Calves

Overview

Journal Iran J Vet Res

Specialty Veterinary Medicine

Date 2022 Nov 25

PMID 36425600

Authors

V Jaiswal

A P S Brar

B S Sandhu

L D Singla

D Narang

G D Leishangthem

P Kaur

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: , an opportunistic, zoonotic, apicomplexan parasite, is one of the most common causes of diarrhea in neonatal bovine calves around the globe. Bovine calves act as a major source of infection by excreting huge numbers of highly resistant oocysts in faeces, which can survive for a long time in extreme environmental conditions. As low as ten oocysts can cause disease and mortality, leading to the requirement of an early and accurate diagnosis for proper and favorable prognosis, management, and control.

Aims: The current study was conducted with the objective to evaluate various diagnostic techniques (acid fast staining, negative staining, fluorescent, ELISA, PCR, nested PCR, and qPCR) for the detection of in the faecal samples of diarrheic bovine calves.

Methods: Two hundred diarrheic faecal samples from bovine calves were collected and subjected to these techniques for diagnosis. Results of these were evaluated for diagnostic comparison.

Results: Out of 200 faecal samples evaluated, 24% (48/200) were detected positive for Cryptosporidium using a combination of two techniques as gold standard criteria. Cohen's kappa value indicated moderate to almost perfect agreement (0.616 to 0.986) among all the techniques used in the present study. Leishman staining showed the lowest sensitivity (54.17%), while nested PCR and qPCR showed the highest sensitivity (97.92%). Diagnostic specificity of all these tests ranged from 98.68 to 100%.

Conclusion: Auramine stain was used for the first time in the bovine calves in India for the detection and diagnostic comparison of . It showed strong agreement with the molecular as well as classical diagnostic techniques, and can be used for primary screening for better diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Molecular analysis of cryptosporidiosis on cattle farms in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands (Spain).

Del Rio M, Martin S, Quilez J, Vergara-Castiblanco C, Molina J, Ferrer O Int J Vet Sci Med. 2025; 13(1):1-14.

PMID: 39935488 PMC: 11812112. DOI: 10.1080/23144599.2025.2460923.

in Captive Cockatiels ().

Panegossi M, Widmer G, Nagata W, Oliveira B, Ferrari E, Gomes J Pathogens. 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 37242380 PMC: 10222283. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12050710.

References

Newman R, Jaeger K, Wuhib T, Lima A, Guerrant R, Sears C . Evaluation of an antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts. J Clin Microbiol. 1993; 31(8):2080-4. PMC: 265700. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2080-2084.1993. View

McHugh M . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012; 22(3):276-82. PMC: 3900052. View

Mayer C, Palmer C . Evaluation of PCR, nested PCR, and fluorescent antibodies for detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium species in wastewater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996; 62(6):2081-5. PMC: 167986. DOI: 10.1128/aem.62.6.2081-2085.1996. View

Jayalakshmi J, Appalaraju B, Mahadevan K . Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunoassay for the detection of Cryptosporidium antigen in fecal specimens of HIV/AIDS patients. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008; 51(1):137-8. DOI: 10.4103/0377-4929.40427. View

Diaz P, Varcasia A, Pipia A, Tamponi C, Sanna G, Prieto A . Molecular characterisation and risk factor analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in calves from Italy. Parasitol Res. 2018; 117(10):3081-3090. PMC: 7088234. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-018-6000-x. View

Thomson S, Hamilton C, Hope J, Katzer F, Mabbott N, Morrison L . Bovine cryptosporidiosis: impact, host-parasite interaction and control strategies. Vet Res. 2017; 48(1):42. PMC: 5553596. DOI: 10.1186/s13567-017-0447-0. View

Paul S, Chandra D, Ray D, Tewari A, Rao J, Banerjee P . Prevalence and molecular characterization of bovine Cryptosporidium isolates in India. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 153(1-2):143-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.01.044. View

Trotz-Williams L, Jarvie B, Martin S, Leslie K, Peregrine A . Prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum infection in southwestern Ontario and its association with diarrhea in neonatal dairy calves. Can Vet J. 2005; 46(4):349-51. PMC: 1082880. View

Singh B, Sharma R, Kumar H, Banga H, Aulakh R, Gill J . Prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum infection in Punjab (India) and its association with diarrhea in neonatal dairy calves. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 140(1-2):162-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.03.029. View

10.

Khurana S, Sharma P, Sharma A, Malla N . Evaluation of Ziehl-Neelsen staining, auramine phenol staining, antigen detection enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction, for the diagnosis of intestinal cryptosporidiosis. Trop Parasitol. 2013; 2(1):20-3. PMC: 3593504. DOI: 10.4103/2229-5070.97234. View

11.

Henriksen S, Pohlenz J . Staining of cryptosporidia by a modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique. Acta Vet Scand. 1981; 22(3-4):594-6. PMC: 8300528. View

12.

Rekha K, Puttalakshmamma G, Dsouza P . Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines. Vet World. 2016; 9(2):211-5. PMC: 4819375. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.211-215. View

13.

Paul S, Chandra D, Tewari A, Banerjee P, Ray D, Boral R . Comparative evaluation and economic assessment of coprological diagnostic methods and PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in bovines. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 164(2-4):291-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.06.015. View

14.

Manouana G, Lorenz E, Mbong Ngwese M, Nguema Moure P, Maiga Ascofare O, Akenten C . Performance of a rapid diagnostic test for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in African children admitted to hospital with diarrhea. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020; 14(7):e0008448. PMC: 7377516. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008448. View

15.

Johnson D, Pieniazek N, Griffin D, Misener L, Rose J . Development of a PCR protocol for sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995; 61(11):3849-55. PMC: 167689. DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.11.3849-3855.1995. View

16.

Vermeulen L, Benders J, Medema G, Hofstra N . Global Cryptosporidium Loads from Livestock Manure. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(15):8663-8671. PMC: 5645758. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00452. View

17.

Xiao L . Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol. 2009; 124(1):80-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.018. View

18.

Ahmed S, Karanis P . Comparison of current methods used to detect Cryptosporidium oocysts in stools. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018; 221(5):743-763. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.04.006. View

19.

Ghoshal U, Jain V, Dey A, Ranjan P . Evaluation of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for stool antigen detection for the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis among HIV negative immunocompromised patients in a tertiary care hospital of northern India. J Infect Public Health. 2017; 11(1):115-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.06.007. View

20.

Mahmoudi M, Hazrati Tapeh K, Abasi E, Sayyadi H, Aminpour A . Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium in pre-weaned cattle in Urmia (Northwestern Iran). J Infect Dev Ctries. 2021; 15(3):422-427. DOI: 10.3855/jidc.12122. View