» Articles » PMID: 29721269

Size-assortative Choice and Mate Availability Influences Hybridization Between Red Wolves () and Coyotes ()

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2018 May 4
PMID 29721269
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anthropogenic hybridization of historically isolated taxa has become a primary conservation challenge for many imperiled species. Indeed, hybridization between red wolves () and coyotes () poses a significant challenge to red wolf recovery. We considered seven hypotheses to assess factors influencing hybridization between red wolves and coyotes via pair-bonding between the two species. Because long-term monogamy and defense of all-purpose territories are core characteristics of both species, mate choice has long-term consequences. Therefore, red wolves may choose similar-sized mates to acquire partners that behave similarly to themselves in the use of space and diet. We observed multiple factors influencing breeding pair formation by red wolves and found that most wolves paired with similar-sized conspecifics and wolves that formed congeneric pairs with nonwolves (coyotes and hybrids) were mostly female wolves, the smaller of the two sexes. Additionally, we observed that lower red wolf abundance relative to nonwolves and the absence of helpers increased the probability that wolves consorted with nonwolves. However, successful pairings between red wolves and nonwolves were associated with wolves that maintained small home ranges. Behaviors associated with territoriality are energetically demanding and behaviors (e.g., aggressive interactions, foraging, and space use) involved in maintaining territories are influenced by body size. Consequently, we propose the hypothesis that size disparities between consorting red wolves and coyotes influence positive assortative mating and may represent a reproductive barrier between the two species. We offer that it may be possible to maintain wild populations of red wolves in the presence of coyotes if management strategies increase red wolf abundance on the landscape by mitigating key threats, such as human-caused mortality and hybridization with coyotes. Increasing red wolf abundance would likely restore selection pressures that increase mean body and home-range sizes of red wolves and decrease hybridization rates via reduced occurrence of congeneric pairs.

Citing Articles

Genetic structure and common ancestry expose the dingo-dog hybrid myth.

Weeks A, Kriesner P, Bartonicek N, van Rooyen A, Cairns K, Ahrens C Evol Lett. 2025; 9(1):1-12.

PMID: 39906582 PMC: 11790216. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrae057.


Simulating the efficacy of wolf-dog hybridization management with individual-based modeling.

Santostasi N, Bauduin S, Grente O, Gimenez O, Ciucci P Conserv Biol. 2024; 39(1):e14312.

PMID: 38894638 PMC: 11780192. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14312.


Hybridization in Canids-A Case Study of Pampas Fox () and Domestic Dog () Hybrid.

Szynwelski B, Kretschmer R, Matzenbacher C, Ferrari F, Alievi M, de Freitas T Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(15).

PMID: 37570312 PMC: 10417603. DOI: 10.3390/ani13152505.


The natural history and ecology of melanism in red wolf and coyote populations of the southeastern United States - evidence for Gloger's rule.

Hinton J, West K, Sullivan D, Frair J, Chamberlain M BMC Zool. 2023; 7(1):33.

PMID: 37170305 PMC: 10127370. DOI: 10.1186/s40850-022-00138-5.


Recursive use of home ranges and seasonal shifts in foraging behavior by a generalist carnivore.

Youngmann J, Hinton J, Bakner N, Chamberlain M, DAngelo G Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(11):e9540.

PMID: 36440319 PMC: 9685673. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9540.


References
1.
Mallet J . Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 20(5):229-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010. View

2.
Sikes R . 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J Mammal. 2018; 97(3):663-688. PMC: 5909806. DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw078. View

3.
Bohling J, Dellinger J, McVey J, Cobb D, Moorman C, Waits L . Describing a developing hybrid zone between red wolves and coyotes in eastern North Carolina, USA. Evol Appl. 2016; 9(6):791-804. PMC: 4908465. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12388. View

4.
Crossman C, Taylor E, Barrett-Lennard L . Hybridization in the Cetacea: widespread occurrence and associated morphological, behavioral, and ecological factors. Ecol Evol. 2016; 6(5):1293-303. PMC: 4775523. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1913. View

5.
Swenson N, Howard D . Clustering of contact zones, hybrid zones, and phylogeographic breaks in North America. Am Nat. 2005; 166(5):581-91. DOI: 10.1086/491688. View