» Articles » PMID: 23864253

Inter-specific Territoriality in a Canis Hybrid Zone: Spatial Segregation Between Wolves, Coyotes, and Hybrids

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2013 Jul 19
PMID 23864253
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gray wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (Canis latrans) generally exhibit intraspecific territoriality manifesting in spatial segregation between adjacent packs. However, previous studies have found a high degree of interspecific spatial overlap between sympatric wolves and coyotes. Eastern wolves (Canis lycaon) are the most common wolf in and around Algonquin Provincial Park (APP), Ontario, Canada and hybridize with sympatric gray wolves and coyotes. We hypothesized that all Canis types (wolves, coyotes, and hybrids) exhibit a high degree of spatial segregation due to greater genetic, morphologic, and ecological similarities between wolves and coyotes in this hybrid system compared with western North American ecosystems. We used global positioning system telemetry and probabilistic measures of spatial overlap to investigate spatial segregation between adjacent Canis packs. Our hypothesis was supported as: (1) the probability of locating wolves, coyotes, and hybrids within home ranges ([Formula: see text] = 0.05) or core areas ([Formula: see text] < 0.01) of adjacent packs was low; and (2) the amount of shared space use was negligible. Spatial segregation did not vary substantially in relation to genotypes of adjacent packs or local environmental conditions (i.e., harvest regulations or road densities). We provide the first telemetry-based demonstration of spatial segregation between wolves and coyotes, highlighting the novel relationships between Canis types in the Ontario hybrid zone relative to areas where wolves and coyotes are reproductively isolated. Territoriality among Canis may increase the likelihood of eastern wolves joining coyote and hybrid packs, facilitate hybridization, and could play a role in limiting expansion of the genetically distinct APP eastern wolf population.

Citing Articles

Coyotes can do 'puppy dog eyes' too: comparing interspecific variation in facial expression muscles.

Cunningham P, Shankar M, vonHoldt B, Brzeski K, Kienle S R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(10):241046.

PMID: 39359465 PMC: 11444785. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241046.


How to Choose? Comparing Different Methods to Count Wolf Packs in a Protected Area of the Northern Apennines.

Dissegna A, Rota M, Basile S, Fusco G, Mencucci M, Cappai N Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(4).

PMID: 37107690 PMC: 10137897. DOI: 10.3390/genes14040932.


Evidence of economical territory selection in a cooperative carnivore.

Sells S, Mitchell M, Podruzny K, Gude J, Keever A, Boyd D Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1946):20210108.

PMID: 33653139 PMC: 7934961. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0108.


Population Genomic Analysis of North American Eastern Wolves (Canis lycaon) Supports Their Conservation Priority Status.

Heppenheimer E, Harrigan R, Rutledge L, Koepfli K, DeCandia A, Brzeski K Genes (Basel). 2018; 9(12).

PMID: 30518163 PMC: 6316216. DOI: 10.3390/genes9120606.


Home range size, vegetation density, and season influences prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans).

Ward J, Hinton J, Johannsen K, Karlin M, Miller K, Chamberlain M PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0203703.

PMID: 30303970 PMC: 6179196. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203703.


References
1.
Gese , RUFF . Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors. Anim Behav. 1997; 54(5):1155-66. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0561. View

2.
Benson J, Patterson B, Mahoney P . A protected area influences genotype-specific survival and the structure of a Canis hybrid zone. Ecology. 2014; 95(2):254-64. DOI: 10.1890/13-0698.1. View

3.
Rutledge L, Garroway C, Loveless K, Patterson B . Genetic differentiation of eastern wolves in Algonquin Park despite bridging gene flow between coyotes and grey wolves. Heredity (Edinb). 2010; 105(6):520-31. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.6. View

4.
Wolf H, Mort M . Inter-specific hybridization underlies phenotypic variability in Daphnia populations. Oecologia. 2017; 68(4):507-511. DOI: 10.1007/BF00378763. View

5.
Borger L, Franconi N, De Michele G, Gantz A, Meschi F, Manica A . Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. J Anim Ecol. 2006; 75(6):1393-405. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01164.x. View