» Articles » PMID: 29682092

Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads

Overview
Journal Open Dent J
Publisher Bentham Open
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2018 Apr 24
PMID 29682092
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this investigation is to study prosthodontics and internal components resistance to the masticatory stress and considering different force directions by using Finite Element Method analysis (FEM). The structural materials of the components are usually Titanium alloy grade 4 or 5 and thus, guarantee the integration of the fixture in the bone due to the osteointegration phenomena. Even if the long-term dental implant survival rate is easy to be obtained and confirmed by numerous researches, the related clinical success, due to the alteration of the mechanical and prosthodontics components is still controversial.

Methods: By applying engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses, it has been investigated how dental implant material was held against the masticatory strength during the dynamic masticatory cycles. A three-dimensional system involved fixture, abutment and the connection screws, which were created and analyzed. The elastic features of the materials used in the study were taken from recent literature data.

Results: Data revealed a different response for both types of devices, although implant neck and dental abutment showed better results for all conditions of loading while the abutment screw represented aweak point of the system.

Conclusion: The data of this virtual model showed all the features of different prosthetic retention systems under the masticatory load. Clinicians should find better prosthetic balance in order to better distribute the stress over the component and to guarantee patients' clinical long-term results.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical Optimization of the Human Bite Using Numerical Analysis Based on the Finite Element Method.

Gonzalez-Martin M, Hermida-Cabrera P, Gutierrez-Corrales A, Torres-Carranza E, Ruiz-de-Leon G, Garcia-Mira B Biomimetics (Basel). 2025; 10(2).

PMID: 39997103 PMC: 11852684. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics10020080.


Evaluation of stress patterns in teeth with endodontic treatment and periapical lesions as abutments for fixed prosthesis: a finite element analysis study.

Koc S, Kirmali O, Celik H BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):130.

PMID: 39856673 PMC: 11760115. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05501-9.


Non-Linear Biomechanical Evaluation and Comparison in the Assessment of Three Different Piece Dental Implant Systems for the Molar Region: A Finite Element Study.

Serrato-Pedrosa J, Villanueva-Fierro I, Marquet-Rivera R, Hernandez-Vazquez R, Cruz-Lopez S, Loera-Castaneda V J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39852573 PMC: 11766260. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16010017.


Impact Testing in Implant-Supported Prostheses and Natural Teeth: A Systematic Review of Properties and Performance.

Marti-Vigil J, Casamitjana J, Marimon X, Cerrolaza M, Medina-Galvez R, Canto-Naves O Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(16).

PMID: 39203218 PMC: 11356274. DOI: 10.3390/ma17164040.


An epidemiological qualitative/quantitative SWOT-AHP analysis in order to highlight the positive or critical aspects of dental implants: A pilot study.

Aliberti S, Funk R, De Stefano M, Hoffmann T, Capunzo M Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(2):e2836.

PMID: 38450945 PMC: 10918715. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.836.


References
1.
Cicciu M, Risitano G, Maiorana C, Franceschini G . Parametric analysis of the strength in the ''Toronto'' osseous-prosthesis system. Minerva Stomatol. 2009; 58(1-2):9-23. View

2.
Meric G, Erkmen E, Kurt A, Eser A, Ozden A . Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011; 70(1):61-71. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2011.597775. View

3.
Vult von Steyern P, Carlson P, Nilner K . All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32(3):180-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01437.x. View

4.
Kelly J . Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81(6):652-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70103-4. View

5.
Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, Odaki M, Nemoto K, Aida M . Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 75(2):457-63. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30328. View