» Articles » PMID: 24955150

FEM Evaluation of Cemented-retained Versus Screw-retained Dental Implant Single-tooth Crown Prosthesis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Jun 24
PMID 24955150
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.

Citing Articles

An In Vitro Evaluation of Periotest Implant Stability Measurements Taken on Implant Retained Crowns and Healing Abutments.

OBrien C, Naughton D, Honari B, Winning L, Polyzois I Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(3):e910.

PMID: 38881222 PMC: 11180707. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.910.


Tribocorrosion of 3D printed dental implants: An overview.

De Stefano M, Singh K, Raina A, Mohan S, Ul Haq M, Ruggiero A J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2024; 19(3):644-663.

PMID: 38807965 PMC: 11131088. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2024.05.004.


The Use of Customized Three-Dimensionally Printed Mandible Prostheses with a Pressure-Reducing Device: A Finite Element Analysis in Different Chewing Positions, Biomechanical Testing, and In Vivo Animal Study Using Lanyu Pigs.

Chen C, Chen C, Chen H, Huang W, Chen Y, Chang H Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:9880454.

PMID: 35342763 PMC: 8942632. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9880454.


Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained.

Lee J, Jang H, Lee S Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(10).

PMID: 34069608 PMC: 8160992. DOI: 10.3390/ma14102666.


Role of New Hydrophilic Surfaces on Early Success Rate and Implant Stability: 1-Year Post-loading Results of a Multicenter, Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Tallarico M, Baldini N, Gatti F, Martinolli M, Xhanari E, Meloni S Eur J Dent. 2020; 15(1):1-7.

PMID: 33242915 PMC: 7902108. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713952.


References
1.
Al-Sukhun J, Lindqvist C, Helenius M . Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. II. Variables affecting the predictive behavior of a finite element model of a human mandible. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 80(1):247-56. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30881. View

2.
Pietrabissa R, Contro R, Quaglini V, Soncini M, Gionso L, Simion M . Experimental and computational approach for the evaluation of the biomechanical effects of dental bridge misfit. J Biomech. 2000; 33(11):1489-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00089-0. View

3.
Bergkvist G, Simonsson K, Rydberg K, Johansson F, Derand T . A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10(1):40-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00059.x. View

4.
Covani U, Ricci M, Tonelli P, Barone A . An evaluation of new designs in implant-abutment connections: a finite element method assessment. Implant Dent. 2013; 22(3):263-7. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318292625f. View

5.
Boschian Pest L, Guidotti S, Pietrabissa R, Gagliani M . Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33(9):690-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01538.x. View