» Articles » PMID: 29666244

Spatial Determinants of Quorum Signaling in a Infection Model

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Apr 19
PMID 29666244
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quorum sensing (QS) is a bacterial communication system that involves production and sensing of extracellular signals. In laboratory models, QS allows bacteria to monitor and respond to their own cell density and is critical for fitness. However, how QS proceeds in natural, spatially structured bacterial communities is not well understood, which significantly hampers our understanding of the emergent properties of natural communities. To address this gap, we assessed QS signaling in the opportunistic pathogen in a cystic fibrosis (CF) lung infection model that recapitulates the biogeographical aspects of the natural human infection. In this model, grows as spatially organized, highly dense aggregates similar to those observed in the human CF lung. By combining this natural aggregate system with a micro-3D-printing platform that allows for confinement and precise spatial positioning of aggregates, we assessed the impact of aggregate size and spatial positioning on both intra- and interaggregate signaling. We discovered that aggregates containing ∼2,000 signal-producing were unable to signal neighboring aggregates, while those containing ≥5,000 cells signaled aggregates as far away as 176 µm. Not all aggregates within this "calling distance" responded, indicating that aggregates have differential sensitivities to signal. Overexpression of the signal receptor increased aggregate sensitivity to signal, suggesting that the ability of aggregates to respond is defined in part by receptor levels. These studies provide quantitative benchmark data for the impact of spatial arrangement and phenotypic heterogeneity on signaling in vivo.

Citing Articles

Echinacoside reduces intracellular c-di-GMP levels and potentiates tobramycin activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm aggregates.

Cai Y, Hong F, De Craemer A, Malone J, Crabbe A, Coenye T NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025; 11(1):40.

PMID: 40055321 PMC: 11889090. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-025-00673-2.


Use of analytical strategies to understand spatial chemical variation in bacterial surface communities.

Weaver A, Shrout J J Bacteriol. 2025; 207(2):e0040224.

PMID: 39873490 PMC: 11841061. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00402-24.


Framework nucleic acid strategy enables closer microbial contact for programming short-range interaction.

Chen N, Xi J, Du N, Shen R, Zhao R, He W Sci Adv. 2024; 10(50):eadr4399.

PMID: 39661693 PMC: 11633756. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adr4399.


Exploring aggregation genes in a chronic infection model.

Gannon A, Matlack J, Darch S J Bacteriol. 2024; 207(1):e0042924.

PMID: 39660900 PMC: 11784459. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00429-24.


RNA-seq reproducibility of in laboratory models of cystic fibrosis.

Duncan R, Lewin G, Cornforth D, Diggle F, Kapur A, Moustafa D Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 13(1):e0151324.

PMID: 39625302 PMC: 11705926. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01513-24.


References
1.
Palmer K, Brown S, Whiteley M . Membrane-bound nitrate reductase is required for anaerobic growth in cystic fibrosis sputum. J Bacteriol. 2007; 189(12):4449-55. PMC: 1913347. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00162-07. View

2.
Stacy A, Everett J, Jorth P, Trivedi U, Rumbaugh K, Whiteley M . Bacterial fight-and-flight responses enhance virulence in a polymicrobial infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(21):7819-24. PMC: 4040543. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1400586111. View

3.
Pammi M, Liang R, Hicks J, Mistretta T, Versalovic J . Biofilm extracellular DNA enhances mixed species biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Candida albicans. BMC Microbiol. 2013; 13:257. PMC: 3833181. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-257. View

4.
Bellin D, Sakhtah H, Zhang Y, Price-Whelan A, Dietrich L, Shepard K . Electrochemical camera chip for simultaneous imaging of multiple metabolites in biofilms. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:10535. PMC: 4737866. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10535. View

5.
Bjarnsholt T, Alhede M, Alhede M, Eickhardt-Sorensen S, Moser C, Kuhl M . The in vivo biofilm. Trends Microbiol. 2013; 21(9):466-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.06.002. View