» Articles » PMID: 29604457

Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Lesion Impairs Regulation of Internally and Externally Directed Attention

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Apr 1
PMID 29604457
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our capacity to flexibly shift between internally and externally directed attention is crucial for successful performance of activities in our daily lives. Neuroimaging studies have implicated the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) in both internally directed processes, including autobiographical memory retrieval and future planning, and externally directed processes, including cognitive control and selective attention. However, the causal involvement of the LPFC in regulating internally directed attention states is unknown. The current study recorded scalp EEG from patients with LPFC lesions and healthy controls as they performed an attention task that instructed them to direct their attention either to the external environment or their internal milieu. We compared frontocentral midline theta and posterior alpha between externally and internally directed attention states. While healthy controls showed increased theta power during externally directed attention and increased alpha power during internally directed attention, LPFC patients revealed no differences between the two attention states in either electrophysiological measure in the analyzed time windows. These findings provide evidence that damage to the LPFC leads to dysregulation of both types of attention, establishing the important role of LPFC in supporting sustained periods of internally and externally directed attention.

Citing Articles

Does familiarity-detection flip attention inward? The familiarity-flip-of-attention account of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions.

Cleary A, McNeely-White K, Neisser J, Drane D, Liegeois-Chauvel C, Pedersen N Mem Cognit. 2025; .

PMID: 39775501 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01673-x.


Predicting attentional focus: Heartbeat-evoked responses and brain dynamics during interoceptive and exteroceptive processing.

Flo E, Belloli L, Cabana A, Ruyant-Belabbas A, Jodaitis L, Valente M PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(12):pgae531.

PMID: 39677366 PMC: 11645458. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae531.


Neural dynamics of shifting attention between perception and working-memory contents.

Gresch D, Boettcher S, Gohil C, van Ede F, Nobre A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(47):e2406061121.

PMID: 39536078 PMC: 11588118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2406061121.


Attentional switch to memory: An early and critical phase of the cognitive cascade allowing autobiographical memory retrieval.

Servais A, Hurter C, Barbeau E Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 30(5):1707-1721.

PMID: 37118526 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02270-w.


Top-down control of human motor thalamic neuronal activity during the auditory oddball task.

Alanazi F, Kalia S, Hodaie M, Lopez Rios A, Lozano A, Milosevic L NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2023; 9(1):46.

PMID: 36973276 PMC: 10042852. DOI: 10.1038/s41531-023-00493-1.


References
1.
Tollner T, Wang Y, Makeig S, Muller H, Jung T, Gramann K . Two Independent Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations during Conflict Detection and Adaptation in a Simon-Type Manual Reaching Task. J Neurosci. 2017; 37(9):2504-2515. PMC: 6596837. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1752-16.2017. View

2.
Jann K, Dierks T, Boesch C, Kottlow M, Strik W, Koenig T . BOLD correlates of EEG alpha phase-locking and the fMRI default mode network. Neuroimage. 2009; 45(3):903-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.001. View

3.
Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J . FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:156869. PMC: 3021840. DOI: 10.1155/2011/156869. View

4.
Polich J . Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007; 118(10):2128-48. PMC: 2715154. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019. View

5.
Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier J . Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989; 72(2):184-7. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6. View