Eyes-closed Versus Eyes-open Differences in Spontaneous Neural Dynamics During Development

Overview

Journal Neuroimage

Specialty Radiology

Date 2022 May 31

PMID 35636737

Authors

Nathan M Petro

Lauren R Ott

Samantha H Penhale

Maggie P Rempe

Christine M Embury

Giorgia Picci

Yu-Ping Wang

Julia M Stephen

Vince D Calhoun

Tony W Wilson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Assessing brain activity during rest has become a widely used approach in developmental neuroscience. Extant literature has measured resting brain activity both during eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, but the difference between these conditions has not yet been well characterized. Studies, limited to fMRI and EEG, have suggested that eyes-open versus -closed conditions may differentially impact neural activity, especially in visual cortices.

Methods: Spontaneous cortical activity was recorded using MEG from 108 typically developing youth (9-15 years-old; 55 female) during separate sessions of eyes-open and eyes-closed rest. MEG source images were computed, and the strength of spontaneous neural activity was estimated in the canonical delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands, respectively. Power spectral density maps for eyes-open were subtracted from eyes-closed rest, and then submitted to vertex-wise regression models to identify spatially specific differences between conditions and as a function of age and sex.

Results: Relative alpha power was weaker in the eyes-open compared to -closed condition, but otherwise eyes-open was stronger in all frequency bands, with differences concentrated in the occipital cortex. Relative theta power became stronger in the eyes-open compared to the eyes-closed condition with increasing age in frontal cortex. No differences were observed between males and females.

Conclusions: The differences in relative power from eyes-closed to -open conditions are consistent with changes observed in task-based visual sensory responses. Age differences occurred in relatively late developing frontal regions, consistent with canonical attention regions, suggesting that these differences could be reflective of developmental changes in attention processes during puberty. Taken together, resting-state paradigms using eyes-open versus -closed produce distinct results and, in fact, can help pinpoint sensory related brain activity.

Citing Articles

Sexual dimorphism in cortical theta rhythms relates to elevated internalizing symptoms during adolescence.

Petro N, Picci G, Ott L, Rempe M, Embury C, Penhale S Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025; 2.

PMID: 40052171 PMC: 11883822. DOI: 10.1162/imag_a_00062.

Atypical Resting-State EEG Graph Metrics of Network Efficiency Across Development in Autism and Their Association with Social Cognition: Results from the LEAP Study.

de Jonge E, Garces P, de Bildt A, Groen Y, Jones E, Mason L J Autism Dev Disord. 2025; .

PMID: 39951212 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-025-06731-0.

Interactive effects of social media use and puberty on resting-state cortical activity and mental health symptoms.

Petro N, Picci G, Webert L, Schantell M, Son J, Ward T Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 71():101479.

PMID: 39608108 PMC: 11636332. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101479.

EEG differences in competitive female gymnastics, soccer, and esports athletes between resting states with eyes closed and open.

Ramyarangsi P, Bennett S, Siripornpanich V, Nanbancha A, Pokaisasawan A, Chatthong W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23317.

PMID: 39375439 PMC: 11458600. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74665-1.

A Novel Time-Frequency Parameterization Method for Oscillations in Specific Frequency Bands and Its Application on OPM-MEG.

Liang X, Wang R, Wu H, Ma Y, Liu C, Gao Y Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199731 PMC: 11351447. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080773.

References

Gerster M, Waterstraat G, Litvak V, Lehnertz K, Schnitzler A, Florin E . Separating Neural Oscillations from Aperiodic 1/f Activity: Challenges and Recommendations. Neuroinformatics. 2022; 20(4):991-1012. PMC: 9588478. DOI: 10.1007/s12021-022-09581-8. View

Pfurtscheller G . Event-related synchronization (ERS): an electrophysiological correlate of cortical areas at rest. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 83(1):62-9. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90133-3. View

Kam J, Solbakk A, Endestad T, Meling T, Knight R . Lateral prefrontal cortex lesion impairs regulation of internally and externally directed attention. Neuroimage. 2018; 175:91-99. PMC: 5960633. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.063. View

Allen E, Damaraju E, Eichele T, Wu L, Calhoun V . EEG Signatures of Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity States. Brain Topogr. 2017; 31(1):101-116. PMC: 5568463. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-017-0546-2. View

Wiesman A, da Silva Castanheira J, Baillet S . Stability of spectral estimates in resting-state magnetoencephalography: Recommendations for minimal data duration with neuroanatomical specificity. Neuroimage. 2021; 247:118823. PMC: 8852336. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118823. View

Sauseng P, Hoppe J, Klimesch W, Gerloff C, Hummel F . Dissociation of sustained attention from central executive functions: local activity and interregional connectivity in the theta range. Eur J Neurosci. 2007; 25(2):587-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05286.x. View

Lew B, Fitzgerald E, Ott L, Penhale S, Wilson T . Three-year reliability of MEG resting-state oscillatory power. Neuroimage. 2021; 243:118516. PMC: 8590732. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118516. View

Fiebelkorn I, Kastner S . A Rhythmic Theory of Attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018; 23(2):87-101. PMC: 6343831. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.009. View

Wierenga L, Langen M, Oranje B, Durston S . Unique developmental trajectories of cortical thickness and surface area. Neuroimage. 2013; 87:120-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.010. View

10.

Clarke A, Roberts B, Ranganath C . Neural oscillations during conditional associative learning. Neuroimage. 2018; 174:485-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.053. View

11.

Magosso E, Ricci G, Ursino M . Alpha and theta mechanisms operating in internal-external attention competition. J Integr Neurosci. 2021; 20(1):1-19. DOI: 10.31083/j.jin.2021.01.422. View

12.

Orekhova E, Stroganova T, Posikera I, Elam M . EEG theta rhythm in infants and preschool children. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 117(5):1047-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.027. View

13.

Cohen D . Magnetoencephalography: evidence of magnetic fields produced by alpha-rhythm currents. Science. 1968; 161(3843):784-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.161.3843.784. View

14.

Knyazev G . EEG delta oscillations as a correlate of basic homeostatic and motivational processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 36(1):677-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.10.002. View

15.

Huang M, Mosher J, Leahy R . A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. Phys Med Biol. 1999; 44(2):423-40. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/010. View

16.

Gomez C, Perez-Macias J, Poza J, Fernandez A, Hornero R . Spectral changes in spontaneous MEG activity across the lifespan. J Neural Eng. 2013; 10(6):066006. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/6/066006. View

17.

Taulu S, Simola J . Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51(7):1759-68. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/008. View

18.

Wiesman A, Murman D, Losh R, Schantell M, Christopher-Hayes N, Johnson H . Spatially resolved neural slowing predicts impairment and amyloid burden in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2022; 145(6):2177-2189. PMC: 9246709. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab430. View

19.

Smith S, Nichols T . Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(1):83-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061. View

20.

Candelaria-Cook F, Solis I, Schendel M, Wang Y, Wilson T, Calhoun V . Developmental trajectory of MEG resting-state oscillatory activity in children and adolescents: a longitudinal reliability study. Cereb Cortex. 2022; 32(23):5404-5419. PMC: 9712698. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac023. View