» Articles » PMID: 33979407

Detection of Mind Wandering Using EEG: Within and Across Individuals

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 May 12
PMID 33979407
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mind wandering is often characterized by attention oriented away from an external task towards our internal, self-generated thoughts. This universal phenomenon has been linked to numerous disruptive functional outcomes, including performance errors and negative affect. Despite its prevalence and impact, studies to date have yet to identify robust behavioral signatures, making unobtrusive, yet reliable detection of mind wandering a difficult but important task for future applications. Here we examined whether electrophysiological measures can be used in machine learning models to accurately predict mind wandering states. We recorded scalp EEG from participants as they performed an auditory target detection task and self-reported whether they were on task or mind wandering. We successfully classified attention states both within (person-dependent) and across (person-independent) individuals using event-related potential (ERP) measures. Non-linear and linear machine learning models detected mind wandering above-chance within subjects: support vector machine (AUC = 0.715) and logistic regression (AUC = 0.635). Importantly, these models also generalized across subjects: support vector machine (AUC = 0.613) and logistic regression (AUC = 0.609), suggesting we can reliably predict a given individual's attention state based on ERP patterns observed in the group. This study is the first to demonstrate that machine learning models can generalize to "never-seen-before" individuals using electrophysiological measures, highlighting their potential for real-time prediction of covert attention states.

Citing Articles

Dynamic multilayer networks reveal mind wandering.

Xu Z, Tang S, Di Z, Li Z Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1421498.

PMID: 39610866 PMC: 11602470. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1421498.


Individual variability in neural representations of mind-wandering.

Kucyi A, Anderson N, Bounyarith T, Braun D, Shareef-Trudeau L, Treves I Netw Neurosci. 2024; 8(3):808-836.

PMID: 39355438 PMC: 11349032. DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00387.


Gaze-Based Detection of Thoughts across Naturalistic Tasks Using a PSO-Optimized Random Forest Algorithm.

Rahnuma T, Nanjappan Jothiraj S, Kuvar V, Faber M, Knight R, Kam J Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199718 PMC: 11351278. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080760.


EEG complexity measures for detecting mind wandering during video-based learning.

Tang S, Li Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8209.

PMID: 38589498 PMC: 11001605. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58889-9.


Detecting cognitive traits and occupational proficiency using EEG and statistical inference.

Mikheev I, Steiner H, Martynova O Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5605.

PMID: 38453969 PMC: 10920811. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55163-w.


References
1.
Kam J, Dao E, Farley J, Fitzpatrick K, Smallwood J, Schooler J . Slow fluctuations in attentional control of sensory cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 23(2):460-70. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21443. View

2.
Smallwood J, Fishman D, Schooler J . Counting the cost of an absent mind: mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007; 14(2):230-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194057. View

3.
Smallwood J, Schooler J . The restless mind. Psychol Bull. 2006; 132(6):946-958. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946. View

4.
Jin C, Borst J, van Vugt M . Predicting task-general mind-wandering with EEG. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019; 19(4):1059-1073. PMC: 6711882. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-019-00707-1. View

5.
Jin C, Borst J, van Vugt M . Distinguishing vigilance decrement and low task demands from mind-wandering: A machine learning analysis of EEG. Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 52(9):4147-4164. PMC: 7689771. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14863. View