» Articles » PMID: 29601076

Syncope, Hypotension, and Falls in the Treatment of Hypertension: Results from the Randomized Clinical Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

Abstract

Objective: To determine predictors of serious adverse events (SAEs) involving syncope, hypotension, and falls, with particular attention to age, in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

Design: Randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Academic and private practices across the United States (N = 102).

Participants: Adults aged 50 and older with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 130 to 180 mmHg at high risk of cardiovascular disease events, but without diabetes, history of stroke, symptomatic heart failure or ejection fraction less than 35%, dementia, or standing SBP less than 110 mmHg (N = 9,361).

Intervention: Treatment of SBP to a goal of less than 120 mmHg or 140 mmHg.

Measurements: Outcomes were SAEs involving syncope, hypotension, and falls. Predictors were treatment assignment, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, baseline measurements, and baseline use of cardiovascular medications.

Results: One hundred seventy-two (1.8%) participants had SAEs involving syncope, 155 (1.6%) hypotension, and 203 (2.2%) falls. Randomization to intensive SBP control was associated with greater risk of an SAE involving hypotension (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.21-2.32, P = .002), and possibly syncope (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.98-1.79, P = .07), but not falls (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.75-1.29, P = .90). Risk of all three outcomes was higher for participants with chronic kidney disease or frailty. Older age was also associated with greater risk of syncope, hypotension, and falls, but there was no age-by-treatment interaction for any of the SAE outcomes.

Conclusions: Participants randomized to intensive SBP control had greater risk of hypotension and possibly syncope, but not falls. The greater risk of developing these events associated with intensive treatment did not vary according to age.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Dementia in SPRINT.

Reboussin D, Gaussoin S, Pajewski N, Jaeger B, Sachs B, Rapp S Neurology. 2025; 104(3):e213334.

PMID: 39819096 PMC: 11737843. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213334.


10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

Diabetes Care. 2024; 48(Supplement_1):S207-S238.

PMID: 39651970 PMC: 11635050. DOI: 10.2337/dc25-S010.


Optimal Blood Pressure Targets with Age.

Supiano M Clin Geriatr Med. 2024; 40(4):585-595.

PMID: 39349033 PMC: 11443060. DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2024.04.002.


2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Full Version Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.

Moon J, Kang S, Choi J, Lee K, Moon J, Chon S Diabetes Metab J. 2024; 48(4):546-708.

PMID: 39091005 PMC: 11307112. DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2024.0249.


Impact of Anemia on Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Death Among Participants Who Received Intense Blood Pressure Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT.

Liu X, Lin B, Yao S, Pan Z Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(1):6.

PMID: 39077655 PMC: 11262380. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2501006.


References
1.
Lipsitz L, Habtemariam D, Gagnon M, Iloputaife I, Sorond F, Tchalla A . Reexamining the Effect of Antihypertensive Medications on Falls in Old Age. Hypertension. 2015; 66(1):183-9. PMC: 4465868. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05513. View

2.
Ambrosius W, Sink K, Foy C, Berlowitz D, Cheung A, Cushman W . The design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Clin Trials. 2014; 11(5):532-46. PMC: 4156910. DOI: 10.1177/1740774514537404. View

3.
Williamson J, Supiano M, Applegate W, Berlowitz D, Campbell R, Chertow G . Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016; 315(24):2673-82. PMC: 4988796. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050. View

4.
Krousel-Wood M, Islam T, Webber L, Re R, Morisky D, Muntner P . New medication adherence scale versus pharmacy fill rates in seniors with hypertension. Am J Manag Care. 2009; 15(1):59-66. PMC: 2728593. View

5.
Tinetti M, Han L, Lee D, McAvay G, Peduzzi P, Gross C . Antihypertensive medications and serious fall injuries in a nationally representative sample of older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174(4):588-95. PMC: 4136657. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14764. View