» Articles » PMID: 35532917

Time to Clinical Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients 60 Years and Older With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal JAMA Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 May 9
PMID 35532917
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Recent guidelines recommend a systolic blood pressure (BP) goal of less than 150 mm Hg or even 130 mm Hg for adults aged 60 years or older. However, harms from intensive BP treatments occur immediately (eg, syncope, fall), and benefits for cardiovascular event reduction emerge over time. Therefore, harms with low chance of benefit need to be clearer, particularly for those with limited life expectancy.

Objective: To estimate the time needed to potentially derive clinical benefit from intensive BP treatment in patients 60 years and older.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This secondary analysis included individual patient data from published randomized clinical trials with 27 414 patients 60 years or older with hypertension. Patient-level survival data were reconstructed when the original data were not available. Published trials were identified by searching PubMed until October 15, 2021.

Exposures: Intensive BP lowering vs standard BP lowering with the treat-to-target design.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) defined by each trial, which was broadly similar with all trials including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality.

Results: Six trials (original data from 2 trials and reconstructed data from 4 trials) with 27 414 participants (mean age, 70 years; 56.3% were women) were included in the analysis. Intensive BP treatment with a systolic BP target below 140 mm Hg was significantly associated with a 21% reduction in MACE (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.88; P < .001). On average, 9.1 (95% CI, 4.0-20.6) months were needed to prevent 1 MACE per 500 patients with the intensive BP treatment (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 0.002). Likewise, 19.1 (95% CI, 10.9-34.2) and 34.4 (95% CI, 22.7-59.8) months were estimated to avoid 1 MACE per 200 (ARR, 0.005) and 100 (ARR, 0.01) patients, respectively.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this analysis, findings suggest that for patients 60 years and older with hypertension, intensive BP treatment may be appropriate for some adults with a life expectancy of greater than 3 years but may not be suitable for those with less than 1 year.

Citing Articles

Correspondence: Prevention of stroke.

Jolobe O Br J Cardiol. 2025; 31(3):040.

PMID: 39917558 PMC: 11795913. DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2024.040.


Mean arterial pressure at the initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy as a prognostic indicator in patients with acute kidney injury.

Song H, Liao Y, Hu H, Wan Q Ren Fail. 2025; 47(1):2448582.

PMID: 39763014 PMC: 11721759. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2448582.


Higher blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults.

Falk J, Froentjes L, Kirkwood J, Heran B, Kolber M, Allan G Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 12:CD011575.

PMID: 39688187 PMC: 11650777. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011575.pub3.


High Blood Pressure and Impaired Brain Health: Investigating the Neuroprotective Potential of Magnesium.

Alateeq K, Walsh E, Cherbuin N Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39595928 PMC: 11594239. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252211859.


Drug-gene interactions in older patients with coronary artery disease.

Zhang S, Lv C, Dong L, Wu Y, Yin T BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):881.

PMID: 39462319 PMC: 11515805. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05471-7.


References
1.
Lee S, Leipzig R, Walter L . Incorporating lag time to benefit into prevention decisions for older adults. JAMA. 2013; 310(24):2609-10. PMC: 4049260. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.282612. View

2.
Ettehad D, Emdin C, Kiran A, Anderson S, Callender T, Emberson J . Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016; 387(10022):957-967. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8. View

3.
Perego C, Sbolli M, Specchia C, Fiuzat M, McCaw Z, Metra M . Utility of Restricted Mean Survival Time Analysis for Heart Failure Clinical Trial Evaluation and Interpretation. JACC Heart Fail. 2020; 8(12):973-983. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.07.005. View

4.
Tang V, Boscardin W, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Lee S . Time to benefit for colorectal cancer screening: survival meta-analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy trials. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1662. PMC: 4399600. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1662. View

5.
Wei Y, Royston P . Reconstructing time-to-event data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Stata J. 2018; 17(4):786-802. PMC: 5796634. View