» Articles » PMID: 29589084

Soft Tissue Tension is Four Times Lower in the Unstable Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Mar 29
PMID 29589084
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim was to compare patients who suffered recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) with those who did not to clarify the degree of soft tissue tension in dislocation patients.

Methods: The subjects were 18 hips with recurrent dislocation (unstable THA group) and 37 hips without dislocation (stable THA group). To evaluate soft tissue tension, radiographs were taken while applying distal traction at traction forces of 40, 30, and 20% of the body weight (BW) and femoral head displacement was measured. Acetabular offset, femoral offset, limb offset, and leg length discrepancy were measured in patients with a normal contralateral hip joint.

Results: The mean femoral head displacement in the unstable THA group was 5.6 mm at 40% of the BW, 4.6 mm at 30% of the BW, and 3.5 mm at 20% of the BW. In the stable THA group, the mean femoral head displacement was 1.4 mm at 40% of the BW, 1.1 mm at 30% of the BW, and 0.9 mm at 20% of the BW. Significant differences were seen between the groups at all traction forces. Furthermore, on comparing the unstable and stable THA groups, femoral offset was found to significantly be smaller in the affected side than in the healthy side in the unstable THA group.

Conclusions: We found that soft tissue tension is approximately fourfold lower in patients exhibiting recurrent dislocations following THA than in patients exhibiting no dislocations and that femoral offset was related to decreased soft tissue tension.

Citing Articles

Does the limb lengthening reduce the incidence of hip dislocation in patients with neurological disorders and insufficient muscle tension who undergoing hip arthroplasty?.

Li Z, Chu K, Yang M, Liu S, Liu B, Li H Front Surg. 2024; 11:1259039.

PMID: 38881705 PMC: 11177783. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1259039.


Clinical effects of combined anteversion and offset on postoperative dislocation in total hip arthroplasty.

Hidaka R, Matsuda K, Nakamura S, Nakamura M, Kawano H Arthroplasty. 2024; 6(1):22.

PMID: 38704579 PMC: 11070079. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00245-3.


15-year survivorship of a unique dual-modular femoral stem in primary hip arthroplasty.

Scott D, Eppich K, Mehic E, Gray C, Smith C, Johnston M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):312.

PMID: 38649874 PMC: 11036691. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07422-0.


A Comprehensive Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes in Post-traumatic Hip Arthritis: Insights and Perspectives.

Choudhary A, Pisulkar G, Taywade S, Awasthi A, Salwan A Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e56350.

PMID: 38633974 PMC: 11021999. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56350.


Change in hip laxity after anterior capsular suture in total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach.

Imagama T, Matsuki Y, Okazaki T, Kaneoka T, Kawakami T, Yamazaki K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2297.

PMID: 38280950 PMC: 10821920. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52636-w.


References
1.
Takao M, Otake Y, Fukuda N, Sato Y, Armand M, Sugano N . The Posterior Capsular Ligamentous Complex Contributes to Hip Joint Stability in Distraction. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 33(3):919-924. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.026. View

2.
Lewinnek G, Lewis J, Tarr R, COMPERE C, Zimmerman J . Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(2):217-20. View

3.
Malkani A, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz S, Justice B, Manley M . Early- and late-term dislocation risk after primary hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(6 Suppl):21-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.014. View

4.
Howie D, Holubowycz O, Middleton R . Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(12):1095-102. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00570. View

5.
Murray D . The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(2):228-32. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B2.8444942. View