» Articles » PMID: 29584598

Use of 2D U-Net Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Cartilage and Meniscus Segmentation of Knee MR Imaging Data to Determine Relaxometry and Morphometry

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Mar 28
PMID 29584598
Citations 140
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose To analyze how automatic segmentation translates in accuracy and precision to morphology and relaxometry compared with manual segmentation and increases the speed and accuracy of the work flow that uses quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to study knee degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods This retrospective study involved the analysis of 638 MR imaging volumes from two data cohorts acquired at 3.0 T: (a) spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state T1-weighted images and (b) three-dimensional (3D) double-echo steady-state (DESS) images. A deep learning model based on the U-Net convolutional network architecture was developed to perform automatic segmentation. Cartilage and meniscus compartments were manually segmented by skilled technicians and radiologists for comparison. Performance of the automatic segmentation was evaluated on Dice coefficient overlap with the manual segmentation, as well as by the automatic segmentations' ability to quantify, in a longitudinally repeatable way, relaxometry and morphology. Results The models produced strong Dice coefficients, particularly for 3D-DESS images, ranging between 0.770 and 0.878 in the cartilage compartments to 0.809 and 0.753 for the lateral meniscus and medial meniscus, respectively. The models averaged 5 seconds to generate the automatic segmentations. Average correlations between manual and automatic quantification of T1 and T2 values were 0.8233 and 0.8603, respectively, and 0.9349 and 0.9384 for volume and thickness, respectively. Longitudinal precision of the automatic method was comparable with that of the manual one. Conclusion U-Net demonstrates efficacy and precision in quickly generating accurate segmentations that can be used to extract relaxation times and morphologic characterization and values that can be used in the monitoring and diagnosis of OA. RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Citing Articles

Development and evaluation of a deep learning framework for pelvic and sacral tumor segmentation from multi-sequence MRI: a retrospective study.

Yin P, Chen W, Fan Q, Yu R, Liu X, Liu T Cancer Imaging. 2025; 25(1):34.

PMID: 40082955 PMC: 11907785. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-025-00850-8.


Automated Segmentation of Knee Menisci Using U-Net Deep Learning Model: Preliminary Results.

Botnari A, Kadar M, Puia D, Patrascu J, Jr J Maedica (Bucur). 2025; 19(4):690-695.

PMID: 39974461 PMC: 11834842. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.690.


Subject-Based Transfer Learning in Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation.

Gaj S, Thoomukuntla B, Ontaneda D, Nakamura K J Neuroimaging. 2025; 35(1):e70024.

PMID: 39923192 PMC: 11807364. DOI: 10.1111/jon.70024.


Context-Aware Dual-Task Deep Network for Concurrent Bone Segmentation and Clinical Assessment to Enhance Shoulder Arthroplasty Preoperative planning.

Marsilio L, Moglia A, Manzotti A, Cerveri P IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2025; 6:269-278.

PMID: 39906264 PMC: 11793857. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2025.3527877.


Tibiofemoral cartilage strain and recovery following a 3-mile run measured using deep learning segmentation of bone and cartilage.

Bradley P, Kim-Wang S, Blaisdell B, Riofrio A, Collins A, Heckelman L Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2025; 7(1):100556.

PMID: 39802079 PMC: 11720442. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100556.


References
1.
Osaki K, Okazaki K, Takayama Y, Matsubara H, Kuwashima U, Murakami K . Characterization of Biochemical Cartilage Change After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Using T1ρ Mapping Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015; 3(5):2325967115585092. PMC: 4622352. DOI: 10.1177/2325967115585092. View

2.
Pedoia V, Majumdar S, Link T . Segmentation of joint and musculoskeletal tissue in the study of arthritis. MAGMA. 2016; 29(2):207-21. PMC: 7181410. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-016-0532-9. View

3.
Lawrence R, Helmick C, Arnett F, Deyo R, Felson D, Giannini E . Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 1998; 41(5):778-99. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<778::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-V. View

4.
Gong J, Pedoia V, Facchetti L, Link T, Ma C, Li X . Bone marrow edema-like lesions (BMELs) are associated with higher T and T values of cartilage in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knees: a longitudinal study. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2017; 6(6):661-670. PMC: 5219965. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2016.12.11. View

5.
Shim H, Chang S, Tao C, Wang J, Kwoh C, Bae K . Knee cartilage: efficient and reproducible segmentation on high-spatial-resolution MR images with the semiautomated graph-cut algorithm method. Radiology. 2009; 251(2):548-56. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2512081332. View