» Articles » PMID: 14974593

Statistical Validation of Image Segmentation Quality Based on a Spatial Overlap Index

Overview
Journal Acad Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2004 Feb 21
PMID 14974593
Citations 572
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: To examine a statistical validation method based on the spatial overlap between two sets of segmentations of the same anatomy.

Materials And Methods: The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as a statistical validation metric to evaluate the performance of both the reproducibility of manual segmentations and the spatial overlap accuracy of automated probabilistic fractional segmentation of MR images, illustrated on two clinical examples. Example 1: 10 consecutive cases of prostate brachytherapy patients underwent both preoperative 1.5T and intraoperative 0.5T MR imaging. For each case, 5 repeated manual segmentations of the prostate peripheral zone were performed separately on preoperative and on intraoperative images. Example 2: A semi-automated probabilistic fractional segmentation algorithm was applied to MR imaging of 9 cases with 3 types of brain tumors. DSC values were computed and logit-transformed values were compared in the mean with the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: Example 1: The mean DSCs of 0.883 (range, 0.876-0.893) with 1.5T preoperative MRI and 0.838 (range, 0.819-0.852) with 0.5T intraoperative MRI (P < .001) were within and at the margin of the range of good reproducibility, respectively. Example 2: Wide ranges of DSC were observed in brain tumor segmentations: Meningiomas (0.519-0.893), astrocytomas (0.487-0.972), and other mixed gliomas (0.490-0.899).

Conclusion: The DSC value is a simple and useful summary measure of spatial overlap, which can be applied to studies of reproducibility and accuracy in image segmentation. We observed generally satisfactory but variable validation results in two clinical applications. This metric may be adapted for similar validation tasks.

Citing Articles

Development of a deep learning-based model for guiding a dissection during robotic breast surgery.

Lee J, Ham S, Kim N, Park H Breast Cancer Res. 2025; 27(1):34.

PMID: 40065440 PMC: 11895239. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-025-01981-3.


A Case for Automated Segmentation of MRI Data in Milder Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Lewis C, Johnston J, DSouza P, Kolstad J, Zoppo C, Vardar Z medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40034761 PMC: 11875249. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.18.25322304.


Female mice exhibit resistance to disease progression despite early pathology in a transgenic mouse model inoculated with alpha-synuclein fibrils.

Tullo S, Park J, Gallino D, Park M, Mar K, Novikov V Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):288.

PMID: 39987244 PMC: 11846974. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07680-1.


The Impact of Radiation Dose on CT-Based Body Composition Analysis: A Large-Animal Study.

Salhofer L, Jost G, Meetschen M, van Landeghem D, Forsting M, Bos D J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025; 16(1):e13741.

PMID: 39980200 PMC: 11842463. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13741.


Ensemble Learning for Three-dimensional Medical Image Segmentation of Organ at Risk in Brachytherapy Using Double U-Net, Bi-directional ConvLSTM U-Net, and Transformer Network.

Pal S, Singh R, Kumar A J Med Phys. 2025; 49(4):574-582.

PMID: 39926139 PMC: 11801097. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_160_24.


References
1.
Zou K, Warfield S, Fielding J, Tempany C, William 3rd M, Kaus M . Statistical validation based on parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis of continuous classification data. Acad Radiol. 2003; 10(12):1359-68. PMC: 1409756. DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00538-5. View

2.
Choi H, Haynor D, Kim Y . Partial volume tissue classification of multichannel magnetic resonance images-a mixel model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1991; 10(3):395-407. DOI: 10.1109/42.97590. View

3.
Zou K, Tempany C, Fielding J, Silverman S . Original smooth receiver operating characteristic curve estimation from continuous data: statistical methods for analyzing the predictive value of spiral CT of ureteral stones. Acad Radiol. 1998; 5(10):680-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(98)80562-x. View

4.
Kao Y, Sorenson J, Bahn M, Winkler S . Dual-echo MRI segmentation using vector decomposition and probability techniques: a two-tissue model. Magn Reson Med. 1994; 32(3):342-57. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910320310. View

5.
Bonar D, Schaper K, ANDERSON J, Rottenberg D, Strother S . Graphical analysis of MR feature space for measurement of CSF, gray-matter, and white-matter volumes. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993; 17(3):461-70. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199305000-00024. View