» Articles » PMID: 26915082

Segmentation of Joint and Musculoskeletal Tissue in the Study of Arthritis

Overview
Journal MAGMA
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Feb 26
PMID 26915082
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As the most frequent cause of physical disability, musculoskeletal diseases such as arthritis and osteoporosis have a great social and economical impact. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers are important tools that allow clinicians to better characterize, monitor, and even predict musculoskeletal disease progression. Post-processing pipelines often include image segmentation. Manually identifying the border of the region of interest (ROI) is a difficult and time-consuming task. Manual segmentation is also affected by inter- and intrauser variability, thus limiting standardization. Fully automatic or semi-automatic methods that minimize the user interaction are highly desirable. Unfortunately, an ultimate, highly reliable and extensively evaluated solution for joint and musculoskeletal tissue segmentation has not yet been proposed, and many clinical studies still adopt fully manual procedures. Moreover, the clinical translation of several promising quantitative MRI techniques is highly affected by the lack of an established, fast, and accurate segmentation method. The goal of this review is to present some of the techniques proposed in recent literature that have been adopted in clinical studies for joint and musculoskeletal tissue analyses in arthritis patients. The most widely used MRI sequences and image processing algorithms employed to accomplish segmentation challenges will be discussed in this paper.

Citing Articles

Arthritis Foundation/HSS Workshop on Hip Osteoarthritis, Part 2: Detecting Hips at Risk: Early Biomechanical and Structural Mechanisms.

Vassileva M, Kim J, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Harris M, Pedoia V, Lattanzi R HSS J. 2023; 19(4):428-433.

PMID: 37937085 PMC: 10626933. DOI: 10.1177/15563316231192097.


Patch-wise 3D segmentation quality assessment combining reconstruction and regression networks.

Zaman F, Roy T, Sonka M, Wu X J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023; 10(5):054002.

PMID: 37692093 PMC: 10490907. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.5.054002.


Segmentation quality assessment by automated detection of erroneous surface regions in medical images.

Zaman F, Zhang L, Zhang H, Sonka M, Wu X Comput Biol Med. 2023; 164:107324.

PMID: 37591161 PMC: 10563140. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107324.


Diffusion-weighted MRI of total hip arthroplasty for classification of synovial reactions: A pilot study.

Gao M, Tan E, Neri J, Li Q, Burge A, Potter H Magn Reson Imaging. 2022; 96:108-115.

PMID: 36496096 PMC: 9929560. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.12.007.


Narrative Review of Machine Learning in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases for Clinicians and Researchers: Biases, Goals, and Future Directions.

Nelson A, Arbeeva L J Rheumatol. 2022; 49(11):1191-1200.

PMID: 35840150 PMC: 9633365. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220326.


References
1.
Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever M, Pluim J . elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 29(1):196-205. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616. View

2.
Zaid M, Lansdown D, Su F, Pedoia V, Tufts L, Rizzo S . Abnormal tibial position is correlated to early degenerative changes one year following ACL reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2015; 33(7):1079-86. PMC: 7238841. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22867. View

3.
Shan L, Zach C, Charles C, Niethammer M . Automatic atlas-based three-label cartilage segmentation from MR knee images. Med Image Anal. 2014; 18(7):1233-46. PMC: 5025945. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.05.008. View

4.
Wlodarczyk J, Czaplicka K, Tabor Z, Wojciechowski W, Urbanik A . Segmentation of bones in magnetic resonance images of the wrist. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014; 10(4):419-31. PMC: 4379414. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-014-1105-x. View

5.
Ciresan D, Giusti A, Gambardella L, Schmidhuber J . Mitosis detection in breast cancer histology images with deep neural networks. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014; 16(Pt 2):411-8. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_51. View