» Articles » PMID: 19171708

Randomized Phase II Trial of First-line Treatment with Sorafenib Versus Interferon Alfa-2a in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2009 Jan 28
PMID 19171708
Citations 194
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: An open-label, phase II study to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall best response, adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha-2a) in patients with untreated, advanced renal cancer.

Patients And Methods: A total of 189 patients were randomly assigned to oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily or to subcutaneous IFN-alpha-2a 9 million U three times weekly (period 1). Sorafenib patients who progressed were dose-escalated to 600 mg twice daily; IFN-alpha-2a patients who progressed were switched to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (period 2).

Results: In period 1 PFS was similar for sorafenib-treated (n = 97; 5.7 months) and IFN-alpha-2a-treated patients (n = 92; 5.6 months); more sorafenib-treated patients had tumor shrinkage (68.2% v 39.0%). Common drug-related AEs (Grades > or = 3) for sorafenib were hand-foot skin reaction (11.3%), diarrhea (6.2%), and rash/desquamation (6.2%); for IFN-alpha-2a, these were fatigue (10.0%), nausea (3.3%), flu-like syndrome (2.2%), and anorexia (2.2%). Sorafenib-treated patients reported fewer symptoms, better quality of life (QOL), and greater treatment satisfaction. In period 2, 41.9% of patients who received sorafenib 600 mg twice daily (n = 43) experienced tumor reduction (median PFS, 3.6 months). After the switch to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, tumors were reduced in 76.2% of 50 patients (median PFS, 5.3 months). AEs were mostly grade 1 to 2; no increase in AEs of grades > or = 3 occurred after sorafenib dose escalation.

Conclusion: In this study, sorafenib resulted in similar PFS as IFN-alpha-2a in patients with untreated RCC. However, sorafenib-treated patients experienced greater rates of tumor size reduction, better QOL, and improved tolerability. Both dose escalation of sorafenib after progression and a switch to sorafenib after progression on IFN-alpha-2a resulted in clinical benefit.

Citing Articles

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Fleeman N, Houten R, Nevitt S, Mahon J, Beale S, Boland A Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(49):1-190.

PMID: 39252678 PMC: 11404358. DOI: 10.3310/TRRM4238.


Temporary treatment cessation compared with continuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for adults with renal cancer: the STAR non-inferiority RCT.

Collinson F, Royle K, Swain J, Ralph C, Maraveyas A, Eisen T Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(45):1-171.

PMID: 39250424 PMC: 11403377. DOI: 10.3310/JWTR4127.


Current Treatment Options for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Focus on Cell-Based Immunotherapy.

Hwang A, Mehra V, Chhetri J, Ali S, Tran M, Roddie C Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38539542 PMC: 10968958. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16061209.


NKG2ACD8 T cells infiltration determines immunosuppressive contexture and inferior response to immunotherapy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Qiu Y, Liu L, Jiang W, Xu Z, Wang J, Dai S J Immunother Cancer. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38262706 PMC: 10824007. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008368.


Comparative safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Krawczyk K, Sladowska K, Holko P, Kawalec P Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1223929.

PMID: 37745049 PMC: 10512702. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1223929.