» Articles » PMID: 38807965

Tribocorrosion of 3D Printed Dental Implants: An Overview

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 May 29
PMID 38807965
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the advancements in dental science and the growing need for improved dental health, it has become imperative to develop new implant materials which possess better geometrical, mechanical, and physical properties. The oral environment is a corrosive environment and the relative motion between the teeth also makes the environment more hostile. Therefore, the combined corrosion and tribology commonly known as tribocorrosion of implants needs to be studied. The complex shapes of the dental implants and the high-performance requirements of these implants make manufacturing difficult by conventional manufacturing processes. With the advent of additive manufacturing or 3D-printing, the development of implants has become easy. However, the various requirements such as surface roughness, mechanical strength, and corrosion resistance further make the manufacturing of implants difficult. The current paper reviews the various studies related to3D-printed implants. Also, the paper tries to highlight the role of 3D-Printing can play in the area of dental implants. Further studies both experimental and numerical are needed to devise optimized conditions for 3D-printing implants to develop implants with improved mechanical, corrosion, and biological properties.

Citing Articles

Customized 3D-Printed Mesh, Membrane, Bone Substitute, and Dental Implant Applied to Guided Bone Regeneration in Oral Implantology: A Narrative Review.

Di Spirito F, Giordano F, Di Palo M, Ferraro C, Cecere L, Frucci E Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39452431 PMC: 11506345. DOI: 10.3390/dj12100303.

References
1.
Bevilacqua L, Milan A, Del Lupo V, Maglione M, Dolzani L . Biofilms Developed on Dental Implant Titanium Surfaces with Different Roughness: Comparison Between In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Curr Microbiol. 2018; 75(6):766-772. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-018-1446-8. View

2.
Lu Y, Mapili G, Suhali G, Chen S, Roy K . A digital micro-mirror device-based system for the microfabrication of complex, spatially patterned tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 77(2):396-405. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30601. View

3.
Cordeiro J, Faverani L, Grandini C, Rangel E, da Cruz N, Nociti Junior F . Characterization of chemically treated Ti-Zr system alloys for dental implant application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018; 92:849-861. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.07.046. View

4.
Bhargav A, Sanjairaj V, Rosa V, Feng L, Fuh Yh J . Applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017; 106(5):2058-2064. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33961. View

5.
Wilson Jr W, Boland T . Cell and organ printing 1: protein and cell printers. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003; 272(2):491-6. DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.10057. View