» Articles » PMID: 29486787

The Correlation Between Raised Body Mass Index and Assisted Reproductive Treatment Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Mar 1
PMID 29486787
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Public funding for fertility services within the United Kingdom is limited, and therefore, strict guidance exists regarding who can be offered treatment under the National Health Service (NHS). Body mass index (BMI) is a universal criteria adopted by both the public and private sector. This study addresses an important aspect of the impact of a raised BMI on fertility treatment outcomes. We standardise the analysis of the data by only including studies incorporating the WHO BMI criteria; the current reference point for clinicians and clinical commissioning groups in ascertaining which group of patients should receive treatment. This study is an update of the previous systematic review performed in 2010, with the inclusion of a larger number of cycles from central databases such as the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART).

Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted through the Cochrane, Medline and Embase libraries. Data extraction for each outcome measure was pooled and expressed as an odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Where clinical heterogeneity was evident, the random effects model was used to calculate the risk ratio and a fixed effects model was used for the remaining studies. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 49 studies have been identified and included in this systematic review. Overweight and obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m) women have a statistically significant lower live birth rate (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89, p < 0.00001) following Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) when comparisons are drawn to women with a normal BMI. An increase is also demonstrated in the number of miscarriages experienced by women with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.28-1.81, p < 0.00001).

Conclusion: Although this review concludes that a clear impact of BMI on ART outcomes is demonstrated, there remains questions as to the pathophysiology underlying these differences. This review supports the government's stringent criteria regarding BMI categories under which NHS funding is made available for ART, through a clear description of poor reproductive outcomes in women with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m.

Citing Articles

The relevance of female overweight in infertility treatment: a position statement of the Italian Society of Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive Medicine (SIFES-MR).

Carosso A, Conforti A, Cimadomo D, Spadoni V, Zaca C, Massarotti C J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39903407 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03379-0.


Regulation of glucose metabolism: Effects on oocyte, preimplantation embryo, assisted reproductive technology and embryonic stem cell.

Xiong Y, Zhu H, Shi R, Wu Y, Fan Y, Jin L Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38551.

PMID: 39403464 PMC: 11471579. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38551.


Effects of Metabolic Syndrome on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Without Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Li S, Ma S, Yao X, Liu P J Endocr Soc. 2024; 8(10):bvae143.

PMID: 39224458 PMC: 11368129. DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvae143.


Association between pre-gravid body mass index and clinical outcomes in in vitro fertilization: a multicentered retrospective cohort study.

Liu X, Chen P, Wang M, Zhao W, Jin L, Shi J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):469.

PMID: 38982361 PMC: 11234549. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06661-2.


A heatmap for expected cumulative live birth rate in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and chromosomal structural rearrangements.

Van Der Kelen A, Keymolen K, Cools W, De Vos A, Polsler L, De Vos M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(7):1907-1915.

PMID: 38753088 PMC: 11263274. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03141-6.


References
1.
Ramezanzadeh F, Kazemi A, Yavari P, Nasr-Esfahani M, Nejat S, Rahimi-Foroshani A . Impact of body mass index versus physical activity and calorie intake on assisted reproduction outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012; 163(1):52-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.035. View

2.
Pinborg A, Gaarslev C, Hougaard C, Nyboe Andersen A, Andersen P, Boivin J . Influence of female bodyweight on IVF outcome: a longitudinal multicentre cohort study of 487 infertile couples. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 23(4):490-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.010. View

3.
Swieten E, van der Leeuw-Harmsen L, Badings E, van der Linden P . Obesity and Clomiphene Challenge Test as predictors of outcome of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005; 59(4):220-4. DOI: 10.1159/000084347. View

4.
Aly H, Hammad T, Nada A, Mohamed M, Bathgate S, El-Mohandes A . Maternal obesity, associated complications and risk of prematurity. J Perinatol. 2009; 30(7):447-51. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2009.117. View

5.
Loveland J, McClamrock H, Malinow A, Sharara F . Increased body mass index has a deleterious effect on in vitro fertilization outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001; 18(7):382-6. PMC: 3455823. DOI: 10.1023/a:1016622506479. View