» Articles » PMID: 29464087

3D-Printed Masks As a New Approach for Immobilization in Radiotherapy - a Study of Positioning Accuracy

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Feb 22
PMID 29464087
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We developed a new approach to produce individual immobilization devices for the head based on MRI data and 3D printing technologies. The purpose of this study was to determine positioning accuracy with healthy volunteers. 3D MRI data of the head were acquired for 8 volunteers. In-house developed software processed the image data to generate a surface mesh model of the immobilization mask. After adding an interface for the couch, the fixation setup was materialized using a 3D printer with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). Repeated MRI datasets (n=10) were acquired for all volunteers wearing their masks thus simulating a setup for multiple fractions. Using automatic image-to-image registration, displacements of the head were calculated relative to the first dataset (6 degrees of freedom). The production process has been described in detail. The absolute lateral (x), vertical (y) and longitudinal (z) translations ranged between -0.7 and 0.5 mm, -1.8 and 1.4 mm, and -1.6 and 2.4 mm, respectively. The absolute rotations for pitch (x), yaw (y) and roll (z) ranged between -0.9 and 0.8°, -0.5 and 1.1°, and -0.6 and 0.8°, respectively. The mean 3D displacement was 0.9 mm with a standard deviation (SD) of the systematic and random error of 0.2 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. In conclusion, an almost entirely automated production process of 3D printed immobilization masks for the head derived from MRI data was established. A high level of setup accuracy was demonstrated in a volunteer cohort. Future research will have to focus on workflow optimization and clinical evaluation.

Citing Articles

Segmentation methods and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-printed immobilization devices in head and neck radiotherapy.

Yin Y, Zhang W, Zou L, Liu X, Yu L, Wang M BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):289.

PMID: 39966735 PMC: 11837297. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13669-0.


Comprehensive clinical implementation, workflow, and FMEA of bespoke silicone bolus cast from 3D printed molds using open-source resources.

Hobbis D, Armstrong M, Patel S, Tegtmeier R, Laughlin B, Chitsazzadeh S J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(11):e14498.

PMID: 39189817 PMC: 11539970. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14498.


AAPM Task Group 334: A guidance document to using radiotherapy immobilization devices and accessories in an MR environment.

Hobson M, Hu Y, Caldwell B, Cohen G, Glide-Hurst C, Huang L Med Phys. 2024; 51(6):3822-3849.

PMID: 38648857 PMC: 11330642. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17061.


Evaluation of Fused Deposition Modeling Materials for 3D-Printed Container of Dosimetric Polymer Gel.

Lee M, Noh S, Shin J, Kwak J, Jeong C Gels. 2024; 10(2).

PMID: 38391476 PMC: 10888196. DOI: 10.3390/gels10020146.


A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device.

Jablonska P, Parent A, La Macchia N, Chan H, Filleti M, Ramotar M Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023; 42:100663.

PMID: 37587925 PMC: 10425893. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100663.


References
1.
Lee N, Chuang C, Quivey J, Phillips T, Akazawa P, Verhey L . Skin toxicity due to intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 53(3):630-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02756-6. View

2.
Sanghera B, Amis A, McGurk M . Preliminary study of potential for rapid prototype and surface scanned radiotherapy facemask production technique. J Med Eng Technol. 2002; 26(1):16-21. DOI: 10.1080/03091900110102445. View

3.
Li H, Zhu X, Zhang L, Dong L, Tung S, Ahamad A . Comparison of 2D radiographic images and 3D cone beam computed tomography for positioning head-and-neck radiotherapy patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 71(3):916-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.008. View

4.
Tryggestad E, Christian M, Ford E, Kut C, Le Y, Sanguineti G . Inter- and intrafraction patient positioning uncertainties for intracranial radiotherapy: a study of four frameless, thermoplastic mask-based immobilization strategies using daily cone-beam CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 80(1):281-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.022. View

5.
Giske K, Stoiber E, Schwarz M, Stoll A, Muenter M, Timke C . Local setup errors in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients immobilized with a custom-made device. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 80(2):582-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1980. View