» Articles » PMID: 29426312

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Quadriceps Tendon-patellar Bone Allograft: Matched Case Control Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2018 Feb 11
PMID 29426312
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Quadriceps tendon-patellar bone (QTPB) autograft is an excellent graft option with good clinical outcome. Use of QTPB autografts have increased because they minimize donor-site morbidity including anterior knee pain, while providing adequate mechanical strength. Although, there were many clinical results about allografts that used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, it have never been reported about the clinical outcome of ACL reconstruction with QTPB allograft. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of ACL reconstruction with QTPB allograft and to compare with QTPB autograft. We hypothesized that ACL reconstruction with QTPB allograft had good functional outcomes and stability and no significant difference compared to the ACL reconstruction with QTPB autograft.

Methods: From February 2009 to January 2014, 213 cases who received ACL reconstruction with QTPB grafts were included. Forty-five patients who received ACL reconstruction with QTPB allograft were individually matched in age, sex, direction of the injured knee and body mass index (BMI) to a control group of 45 patients who received QTPB autograft. Clinical results were evaluated using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and ligament laxity. An average follow-up time was 31.2 months.

Results: The functional scores and ligament laxity improved from initial to the last visit in those with ACL reconstruction with QTPB allograft (p < 0.05). No significant statistical difference was found in clinical outcomes and complications including re-rupture between the QTPB allograft and autograft groups (p > 0.05). Laxity using anterior drawer test, Lachman test and KT-2000 showed no significant difference. No significant difference was found between the two groups in quadriceps peak extension torque, except at 60° per second at 6 months.

Conclusion: QTPB allograft achieved good clinical outcome with no difference compared with QTPB autograft. QTPB allograft for ACL reconstruction is promising alternative to selected and compliant patients. Long-term follow-up needs to further evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications including re-rupture rate.

Citing Articles

Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon-Patellar Bone Allograft.

Lee D, Lee S, Ro D, Han H Clin Orthop Surg. 2025; 17(1):91-99.

PMID: 39912082 PMC: 11791487. DOI: 10.4055/cios23409.


Incidence of Osteoarthritis Between ACL Reconstruction With Different Graft Types and Between ACL Reconstruction and Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Vendrig T, Keizer M, Brouwer R, Hoogeslag R Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(8):23259671241258775.

PMID: 39157020 PMC: 11328256. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241258775.


A Comparative Analysis of Quadriceps Tendon, Patellar Tendon Bone Allograft, and Cadaver Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Repair and Reconstructive Surgery.

Krumbach B, Meretsky C, Schiuma A, Ajebli M Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e59836.

PMID: 38846230 PMC: 11156480. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59836.


Peracetic acid sterilized tendon and ligament allografts for knee reconstruction : For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and complex knee surgery.

Ahrens P, Borchert G, Freutel C, Ahmed N, Brune J Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024; 53(5):341-347.

PMID: 38498205 PMC: 11052767. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-024-04486-7.


Influence of Graft Type on Lower Extremity Functional Test Performance and Failure Rate After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Roach M, Aderman M, Gee S, Peck K, Roach S, Goss D Sports Health. 2022; 15(4):606-614.

PMID: 36154541 PMC: 10293572. DOI: 10.1177/19417381221119420.


References
1.
Kraeutler M, Bravman J, McCarty E . Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(10):2439-48. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513484127. View

2.
Lund B, Nielsen T, Fauno P, Christiansen S, Lind M . Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2014; 30(5):593-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.012. View

3.
Foster T, Wolfe B, Ryan S, Silvestri L, Krall Kaye E . Does the graft source really matter in the outcome of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? An evaluation of autograft versus allograft reconstruction results: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(1):189-99. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509356530. View

4.
Gorschewsky O, Stapf R, Geiser L, Geitner U, Neumann W . Clinical comparison of fixation methods for patellar bone quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: absorbable cross-pins versus absorbable screws. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(12):2118-25. DOI: 10.1177/0363546507307390. View

5.
Tegner Y, Lysholm J . Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (198):43-9. View