No Difference Between Full Thickness and Partial Thickness Quadriceps Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Systematic Review
Overview
General Surgery
Orthopedics
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: The purpose of this review was to compare outcomes and complication profiles of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) between full thickness (FT-Q) and partial thickness (PT-Q) quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts.
Methods: As per PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched in September 2017 for English language, human studies of all levels of evidence on patients undergoing primary ACL-R with FT-Q or PT-Q. This search was repeated in March 2018 to capture additional articles. Data regarding postoperative outcomes and complications were abstracted. Due to heterogeneous reporting, data were not combined in meta-analysis and were summarized descriptively.
Results: Upon screening 3670 titles, 18 studies satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria. The second search identified an additional two studies for a total of 20 studies (50% case-control, 50% case series). These studies examined 1212 patients (1219 knees) of mean age 29.8 years (range 15-59) followed a mean of 42.2 months (range 12-120). FT-Q and PT-Q autografts were used in eight studies (50.5% of knees), and thirteen studies (49.5% of knees), respectively. Only one study directly compared FT-Q to PT-Q. Instrumented laxity was less than 3 mm in 74.8 and 72.4% of the FT-Q and PT-Q groups, respectively. Postoperative IKDC Subjective Knee Form scores were similar between the FT-Q (82.5) and PT-Q (82.1) groups. Postoperative quadriceps strength, measured as a percentage of the contralateral side, were similar in the FT-Q (89.5%) and PT-Q (85.1%) groups. Graft failure rates for the FT-Q and PT-Q groups were 3.7 and 3.0%, respectively.
Conclusion: Across the 20 studies included in this review, there appeared to be no difference in outcomes or complications between either FT-Q or PT-Q in primary ACL-R. Moreover, primary ACL-R using QT autografts appears to have successful outcomes with a low rate of graft failure, irrespective of tendon thickness. While further comparative studies are needed to better delineate the optimal thickness of quadriceps tendon for primary ACL-R, these data suggest that, in primary ACL-R, either FT-Q or PT-Q is efficacious and, in the clinical setting, surgeons may be justified in using either graft thickness.
Level Of Evidence: IV, Systematic Review of Level III and IV studies.
Rego M, Barroso B, Helito C, Rego M, Canuto S, de Oliveira D Arthrosc Tech. 2025; 14(2):103224.
PMID: 40041365 PMC: 11873529. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103224.
Stokes D, Cram T, Elrick B, Schantz K, Shinsako K, Frank R Arthrosc Tech. 2025; 13(12):103146.
PMID: 39780869 PMC: 11704890. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103146.
New Graft Choices for ACL Reconstruction: Update Article.
Lara P, Novaretti J, Nunes G, Cohen M, Ramos L Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024; 59(5):e642-e649.
PMID: 39649040 PMC: 11624934. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779335.
Ripic Z, Letter M, Parrino R, Adams W, Kaplan L, Baraga M PM R. 2024; 17(3):310-318.
PMID: 39548878 PMC: 11889528. DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13278.
Diaz M, Branch E, Dunn J, Brothers A, Jordan S Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024; 6(5):100968.
PMID: 39534030 PMC: 11551357. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100968.