» Articles » PMID: 31784781

Stress Radiography at 30° of Knee Flexion is a Reliable Evaluation Tool for High-grade Rotatory Laxity in Complete ACL-injured Knees

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2019 Dec 1
PMID 31784781
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of stress radiography and determine the cutoff values for high-grade anterolateral rotatory laxity in complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees at different positions.

Methods: Forty-two patients with complete ACL rupture (group 1) and 37 normal subjects (group 2) were prospectively enrolled. The amount of anterior translation in the medial (MM) and lateral (LL) distance compartments and the difference between them (LL-MM distance) were measured using stress radiography at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° positions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was assessed for the presence of a high-grade (grade > 2) pivot shift.

Results: The MM and LL distances in group 1 were significantly different at 30° and 45° positions (P < 0.05). The AUC of the MM (AUC, 0.903) and LL (AUC, 0.901) distances at the 30° position was significantly higher than that of the other positions (P = 0.000); however, the cutoff values were different to diagnose ACL injury (MM vs. LL, 3.1 mm vs. 5.4 mm). A 2.1-mm cutoff for the LL-MM distance showed 78.4% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity for detecting the presence of a high-grade pivot shift (AUC = 0.905, P = 0.000).

Conclusion: The cutoff values of stress radiography differed according to anatomical references and knee flexion positions. Stress radiography of a 2.1 mm difference in LL-MM distance at 30° of knee flexion can be a reliable method for high-grade rotatory laxity in complete ACL-injured knees.

Level Of Evidence: Level 1, diagnostic study.

Citing Articles

Proximally positioned femoral grafts decrease passive anterior tibial subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a posterior trans-septal portal.

Yang H, Kim J, Seon J Int Orthop. 2024; 48(10):2641-2652.

PMID: 39190104 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06271-9.


The optimal measurement method considering reliability and validity in the anterior knee laxity of anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Jeon S, Han J, Jung M, Chung K, Lee H, Choi C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(8):3523-3532.

PMID: 39105832 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05465-5.


Is conventional magnetic resonance imaging superior to radiography in the functional integrity evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament in patients with knee osteoarthritis?.

Yu Z, Wang H, Wang X, Dong X, Dong J, Liang Q Arthroplasty. 2024; 6(1):37.

PMID: 38902806 PMC: 11188244. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00262-2.


The Functional Integrity of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Can Be Objectively Assessed With the Use of Stress Radiographs: A Systematic Review.

Schwartz J, Rodriguez A, Banovetz M, Braaten J, Larson C, Wulf C Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(4):23259671241246197.

PMID: 38680218 PMC: 11047241. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241246197.


Assessment of knee instability in ACL-injured knees using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT): a novel protocol and preliminary results.

Vidal Leao R, Zelada S, Lobo C, Moreira da Silva A, Godoy-Santos A, Gobbi R Skeletal Radiol. 2024; 53(8):1611-1619.

PMID: 38185734 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04562-1.


References
1.
Bedi A, Musahl V, Lane C, Citak M, Warren R, Pearle A . Lateral compartment translation predicts the grade of pivot shift: a cadaveric and clinical analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18(9):1269-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1160-y. View

2.
Bedi A, Musahl V, OLoughlin P, Maak T, Citak M, Dixon P . A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(9):1788-94. DOI: 10.1177/0363546510369303. View

3.
Beldame J, Bertiaux S, Roussignol X, Lefebvre B, Adam J, Mouilhade F . Laxity measurements using stress radiography to assess anterior cruciate ligament tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010; 97(1):34-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.08.004. View

4.
Beldame J, Mouchel S, Bertiaux S, Adam J, Mouilhade F, Roussignol X . Anterior knee laxity measurement: comparison of passive stress radiographs Telos(®) and "Lerat", and GNRB(®) arthrometer. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98(7):744-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.05.017. View

5.
Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans C . Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(5):267-88. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2011. View