» Articles » PMID: 29413413

Microscopic Charge Fluctuations Cause Minimal Contrast Loss in CryoEM

Overview
Journal Ultramicroscopy
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Feb 8
PMID 29413413
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The fluctuating granularity or "bee swarm" effect seen in highly defocussed transmission electron micrographs is caused by microscopic charge fluctuations in the specimen created by the illuminating beam. In the field of high-resolution single particle electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM), there has been a concern that this fluctuating charge might cause defocus-dependent Thon ring fading which would degrade the final image. In this paper, we have analysed the 2.35 Å fringes from the (111) reflection in images of gold nanoparticles embedded in amorphous ice. We show that there is a small, yet detectable amount of defocus-dependent blurring of the lattice fringes when compared with those from a pure gold foil. The transverse electric field associated with the fluctuating charges on the insulating frozen water specimen deflects the electron beam locally and causes image blurring. The perturbation is small, decreasing the amplitude of the 2.35 Å reflection at 10 µm defocus by about 7% (intensity by 14%). For smaller defocus values in the range 2-4 µm and for resolutions that are typical in cryoEM, the effects of source incoherence and the bee swarm effect are negligible for all reasonable cryoEM imaging conditions, assuming that a field emission gun (FEG) is used for illumination. This leaves physical movement of the specimen due to radiation damage as the outstanding problem and the major source of contrast loss in cryoEM micrographs.

Citing Articles

Electron Imaging of Nanoscale Charge Distributions Induced by Femtosecond Light Pulses.

Weber J, Schafer S Nano Lett. 2024; 24(19):5746-5753.

PMID: 38701367 PMC: 11100287. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00773.


Graphene sandwich-based biological specimen preparation for cryo-EM analysis.

Xu J, Gao X, Zheng L, Jia X, Xu K, Ma Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(5):e2309384121.

PMID: 38252835 PMC: 10835136. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309384121.


Charging of Vitreous Samples in Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Mitigated by Graphene.

Zhang Y, van Schayck J, Pedrazo-Tardajos A, Claes N, Noteborn W, Lu P ACS Nano. 2023; 17(16):15836-15846.

PMID: 37531407 PMC: 10448747. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c03722.


Protein Structural Analysis by Cryogenic Electron Microscopy.

Hall M, Schexnaydre E, Holmlund C, Carroni M Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2652:439-463.

PMID: 37093490 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3147-8_24.


Temporal dynamics of charge buildup in cryo-electron microscopy.

Schreiber M, Maigne A, Beleggia M, Shibata S, Wolf M J Struct Biol X. 2023; 7:100081.

PMID: 36632442 PMC: 9826809. DOI: 10.1016/j.yjsbx.2022.100081.


References
1.
Russo C, Henderson R . Charge accumulation in electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 2018; 187:43-49. PMC: 5862658. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.01.009. View

2.
Russo C, Scotcher S, Kyte M . A precision cryostat design for manual and semi-automated cryo-plunge instruments. Rev Sci Instrum. 2016; 87(11):114302. PMC: 5270774. DOI: 10.1063/1.4967864. View

3.
Danov K, Danev R, Nagayama K . Electric charging of thin films measured using the contrast transfer function. Ultramicroscopy. 2001; 87(1-2):45-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(00)00061-9. View

4.
Brink J, Sherman M, Berriman J, Chiu W . Evaluation of charging on macromolecules in electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 1998; 72(1-2):41-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(97)00126-5. View

5.
Danev R, Buijsse B, Khoshouei M, Plitzko J, Baumeister W . Volta potential phase plate for in-focus phase contrast transmission electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(44):15635-40. PMC: 4226124. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418377111. View