» Articles » PMID: 29384080

Applying GRADE-CERQual to Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Findings-paper 6: How to Assess Relevance of the Data

Abstract

Background: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data and (4) relevance. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual's relevance component.

Methods: We developed the relevance component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual relevance component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application.

Results: When applying CERQual, we define relevance as the extent to which the body of data from the primary studies supporting a review finding is applicable to the context (perspective or population, phenomenon of interest, setting) specified in the review question. In this paper, we describe the relevance component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess relevance in the context of a review finding. This guidance outlines the information required to assess relevance, the steps that need to be taken to assess relevance and examples of relevance assessments.

Conclusions: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of relevance in the context of the CERQual approach. Assessing the relevance component requires consideration of potentially important contextual factors at an early stage in the review process. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase.

Citing Articles

Perceptions, experiences, barriers, facilitators, learning outcomes, and modes of assessment of digital clinical placements for pre-registration physiotherapy students internationally: a systematic review protocol.

McConnell J, Rushton A, Noblet T, Pacey V, Mistry J, Lai J PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0319024.

PMID: 39977452 PMC: 11841889. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319024.


Barriers and facilitators to maternal healthcare in East Africa: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of perspectives from women, their families, healthcare providers, and key stakeholders.

Teshale M, Bante A, Gedefaw Belete A, Crutzen R, Spigt M, Stutterheim S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):111.

PMID: 39901111 PMC: 11792318. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07225-8.


Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low-and middle-income countries: A qualitative systematic review.

Laar A, Harris M, Khan M, Loxton D PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(12):e0000362.

PMID: 39630642 PMC: 11616881. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000362.


Mapping frameworks for synthesizing qualitative evidence in health technology assessment.

Cardoso M, Marques R, Machado-Rugolo J, Thabane L, Puschel V, Weber S Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024; 40(1):e53.

PMID: 39534917 PMC: 11579671. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462324000369.


The educational pathway to Advanced Practice for the physiotherapist: Protocol for a systematic mixed studies review.

Maddigan K, Kowalski K, Tawiah A, Rushton A PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0308921.

PMID: 39331670 PMC: 11432879. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308921.


References
1.
Odendaal W, Goudge J, Griffiths F, Tomlinson M, Leon N, Daniels K . Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences on using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2015(11). PMC: 4966615. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011942. View

2.
Colvin C, Garside R, Wainwright M, Munthe-Kaas H, Glenton C, Bohren M . Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 4: how to assess coherence. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(Suppl 1):13. PMC: 5791039. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8. View

3.
OBrien T, Noyes J, Spencer L, Kubis H, Hastings R, Edwards R . 'Keep fit' exercise interventions to improve health, fitness and well-being of children and young people who use wheelchairs: mixed-method systematic review protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2014; 70(12):2942-51. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12428. View

4.
Toews I, Glenton C, Lewin S, Berg R, Noyes J, Booth A . Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey. PLoS One. 2016; 11(8):e0159290. PMC: 4972302. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159290. View

5.
Booth A . Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Syst Rev. 2016; 5:74. PMC: 4855695. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x. View