» Articles » PMID: 25238684

Facilitators and Barriers to Facility-based Delivery in Low- and Middle-income Countries: a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Sep 21
PMID 25238684
Citations 416
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-quality obstetric delivery in a health facility reduces maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. This systematic review synthesizes qualitative evidence related to the facilitators and barriers to delivering at health facilities in low- and middle-income countries. We aim to provide a useful framework for better understanding how various factors influence the decision-making process and the ultimate location of delivery at a facility or elsewhere. We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis using a thematic analysis. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL and gray literature databases. Study quality was evaluated using the CASP checklist. The confidence in the findings was assessed using the CERQual method. Thirty-four studies from 17 countries were included. Findings were organized under four broad themes: (1) perceptions of pregnancy and childbirth; (2) influence of sociocultural context and care experiences; (3) resource availability and access; (4) perceptions of quality of care. Key barriers to facility-based delivery include traditional and familial influences, distance to the facility, cost of delivery, and low perceived quality of care and fear of discrimination during facility-based delivery. The emphasis placed on increasing facility-based deliveries by public health entities has led women and their families to believe that childbirth has become medicalized and dehumanized. When faced with the prospect of facility birth, women in low- and middle-income countries may fear various undesirable procedures, and may prefer to deliver at home with a traditional birth attendant. Given the abundant reports of disrespectful and abusive obstetric care highlighted by this synthesis, future research should focus on achieving respectful, non-abusive, and high-quality obstetric care for all women. Funding for this project was provided by The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization.

Citing Articles

Facility readiness and experience of women and health care providers in receiving and delivering obstetric care in comprehensive health posts in Ethiopia: a mixed method study.

Ayehu T, Tiruneh G, Tesfaye C, Belete M, Fesseha N, Semahegn A BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):303.

PMID: 39994670 PMC: 11852563. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12453-x.


Respectful maternity care and associated factors among mothers who gave birth at public health institutions in Debre Tabor town, Northwest Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study.

Fentie T, Solomon A, Enyew M, Beyene M, Melese A, Belay A Front Glob Womens Health. 2025; 6:1513906.

PMID: 39917179 PMC: 11798984. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1513906.


Exploring parental knowledge, care-seeking, and support strategies for neonatal illness: an integrative review of the African Great Lakes region.

Farrell S, Mills T, Lavender D Glob Health Action. 2025; 18(1):2450137.

PMID: 39898689 PMC: 11792144. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2450137.


Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Delgado A, Lemos A, Marinho G, Melo R, Pinheiro F, Amorim M Braz J Phys Ther. 2025; 29(2):101169.

PMID: 39854948 PMC: 11804556. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101169.


Developing and evaluating human-centered design solutions for enhancing maternal health service utilization among vulnerable pregnant women in Oromia, Ethiopia: Study protocol for a quasi-experimental study.

Kang B, Tamene H, Lakew Y, Stephens D, Rimal R Gates Open Res. 2025; 8:93.

PMID: 39801791 PMC: 11723881. DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.16277.2.


References
1.
Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Shakibazadeh E, Rashidian A, Hajimiri K, Glenton C, Noyes J . Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 4:CD010412. PMC: 6462850. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010412.pub2. View

2.
Tong A, Flemming K, Mcinnes E, Oliver S, Craig J . Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:181. PMC: 3552766. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181. View

3.
Titaley C, Hunter C, Dibley M, Heywood P . Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery?: a qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010; 10:43. PMC: 2928756. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-43. View

4.
Pitchforth E, van Teijlingen E, GRAHAM W, Dixon-Woods M, Chowdhury M . Getting women to hospital is not enough: a qualitative study of access to emergency obstetric care in Bangladesh. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15(3):214-9. PMC: 2464855. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017285. View

5.
Shiferaw S, Spigt M, Godefrooij M, Melkamu Y, Tekie M . Why do women prefer home births in Ethiopia?. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13:5. PMC: 3562506. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-5. View