» Articles » PMID: 38355285

Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Guidance on Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38355285
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper forms part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and addresses rapid qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs), which use modified systematic, transparent and reproducible methodsu to accelerate the synthesis of qualitative evidence when faced with resource constraints. This guidance covers the review process as it relates to synthesis of qualitative research. 'Rapid' or 'resource-constrained' QES require use of templates and targeted knowledge user involvement. Clear definition of perspectives and decisions on indirect evidence, sampling and use of existing QES help in targeting eligibility criteria. Involvement of an information specialist, especially in prioritising databases, targeting grey literature and planning supplemental searches, can prove invaluable. Use of templates and frameworks in study selection and data extraction can be accompanied by quality assurance procedures targeting areas of likely weakness. Current Cochrane guidance informs selection of tools for quality assessment and of synthesis method. Thematic and framework synthesis facilitate efficient synthesis of large numbers of studies or plentiful data. Finally, judicious use of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the Confidence of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments and of software as appropriate help to achieve a timely and useful review product.

References
1.
Booth A, Carroll C . Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?. Health Info Libr J. 2015; 32(3):220-35. DOI: 10.1111/hir.12108. View

2.
Downe S, Finlayson K, Lawrie T, Lewin S, Glenton C, Rosenbaum S . Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 1 - Using qualitative evidence synthesis to inform guideline scope and develop qualitative findings statements. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019; 17(1):76. PMC: 6686511. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0467-5. View

3.
Carroll C . Qualitative evidence synthesis to improve implementation of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 2017; 356:j80. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j80. View

4.
Booth A, Carroll C, Ilott I, Low L, Cooper K . Desperately seeking dissonance: identifying the disconfirming case in qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 23(1):126-41. DOI: 10.1177/1049732312466295. View

5.
Booth A, Mshelia S, Analo C, Nyakango S . Qualitative evidence syntheses: Assessing the relative contributions of multi-context and single-context reviews. J Adv Nurs. 2019; 75(12):3812-3822. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14186. View