Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance

Overview

Journal J Cogn Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2018 Jan 9

PMID 29308988

Citations 33

Authors

Kirsten C S Adam

Matthew K Robison

Edward K Vogel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Neural measures of working memory storage, such as the contralateral delay activity (CDA), are powerful tools in working memory research. CDA amplitude is sensitive to working memory load, reaches an asymptote at known behavioral limits, and predicts individual differences in capacity. An open question, however, is whether neural measures of load also track trial-by-trial fluctuations in performance. Here, we used a whole-report working memory task to test the relationship between CDA amplitude and working memory performance. If working memory failures are due to decision-based errors and retrieval failures, CDA amplitude would not differentiate good and poor performance trials when load is held constant. If failures arise during storage, then CDA amplitude should track both working memory load and trial-by-trial performance. As expected, CDA amplitude tracked load (Experiment 1), reaching an asymptote at three items. In Experiment 2, we tracked fluctuations in trial-by-trial performance. CDA amplitude was larger (more negative) for high-performance trials compared with low-performance trials, suggesting that fluctuations in performance were related to the successful storage of items. During working memory failures, participants oriented their attention to the correct side of the screen (lateralized P1) and maintained covert attention to the correct side during the delay period (lateralized alpha power suppression). Despite the preservation of attentional orienting, we found impairments consistent with an executive attention theory of individual differences in working memory capacity; fluctuations in executive control (indexed by pretrial frontal theta power) may be to blame for storage failures.

Citing Articles

Electrophysiology Reveals That Intuitive Physics Guides Visual Tracking and Working Memory.

Balaban H, Smith K, Tenenbaum J, Ullman T Open Mind (Camb). 2024; 8:1425-1446.

PMID: 39664257 PMC: 11634321. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00174.

High-altitude exposure leads to increased modularity of brain functional network with the increased occupation of attention resources in early processing of visual working memory.

Zhou J, Wang N, Huang X, Su R, Li H, Ma H Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(5):1-20.

PMID: 39555295 PMC: 11564581. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10091-3.

Alpha Traveling Waves during Working Memory: Disentangling Bottom-Up Gating and Top-Down Gain Control.

Zeng Y, Sauseng P, Alamia A J Neurosci. 2024; 44(50).

PMID: 39505407 PMC: 11638811. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0532-24.2024.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex Increases Nontarget Retrieval during Visual Working Memory.

Ye S, Wu M, Yao C, Xue G, Cai Y eNeuro. 2024; 11(11.

PMID: 39500573 PMC: 11697231. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0265-24.2024.

Influence of presentation duration on filtering of irrelevant stimuli in visual working memory.

Liu Q, Yin X, Guo L, Ye C BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):469.

PMID: 39223690 PMC: 11370116. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01969-2.

References

deBettencourt M, Norman K, Turk-Browne N . Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017; 25(2):605-611. PMC: 5716934. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1309-5. View

Unsworth N, Fukuda K, Awh E, Vogel E . Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014; 27(5):853-65. PMC: 4465247. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00765. View

Adam K, Mance I, Fukuda K, Vogel E . The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015; 27(8):1601-16. PMC: 4494675. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00811. View

Thut G, Nietzel A, Brandt S, Pascual-Leone A . Alpha-band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(37):9494-502. PMC: 6674607. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0875-06.2006. View

Unsworth N, McMillan B . Trial-to-trial fluctuations in attentional state and their relation to intelligence. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014; 40(3):882-91. DOI: 10.1037/a0035544. View

Worden M, Foxe J, Wang N, Simpson G . Anticipatory biasing of visuospatial attention indexed by retinotopically specific alpha-band electroencephalography increases over occipital cortex. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(6):RC63. PMC: 6772495. View

Pelli D . The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):437-42. View

Aly M, Turk-Browne N . Attention promotes episodic encoding by stabilizing hippocampal representations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(4):E420-9. PMC: 4743819. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518931113. View

Esterman M, Rosenberg M, Noonan S . Intrinsic fluctuations in sustained attention and distractor processing. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(5):1724-30. PMC: 6827583. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2658-13.2014. View

10.

Delorme A, Makeig S . EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 134(1):9-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. View

11.

Bays P, Catalao R, Husain M . The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. J Vis. 2009; 9(10):7.1-11. PMC: 3118422. DOI: 10.1167/9.10.7. View

12.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

13.

Unsworth N, McMillan B . Fluctuations in pre-trial attentional state and their influence on goal neglect. Conscious Cogn. 2014; 26:90-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.003. View

14.

Awh E, Vogel E . The bouncer in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 11(1):5-6. DOI: 10.1038/nn0108-5. View

15.

Mangun G . Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology. 1995; 32(1):4-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03400.x. View

16.

Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Heise K, Gruber W, Holz E, Karim A . Brain oscillatory substrates of visual short-term memory capacity. Curr Biol. 2009; 19(21):1846-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.062. View

17.

Rouder J, Morey R, Morey C, Cowan N . How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 18(2):324-30. PMC: 3070885. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0055-3. View

18.

Unsworth N, Robison M . Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014; 22(3):757-65. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0747-6. View

19.

Hsieh L, Ranganath C . Frontal midline theta oscillations during working memory maintenance and episodic encoding and retrieval. Neuroimage. 2013; 85 Pt 2:721-9. PMC: 3859771. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.003. View

20.

Kane M, Engle R . The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003; 9(4):637-71. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196323. View