Forgetting from Lapses of Sustained Attention

Overview

Journal Psychon Bull Rev

Specialty Psychology

Date 2017 Jun 7

PMID 28585055

Citations 35

Authors

Megan T deBettencourt

Kenneth A Norman

Nicholas B Turk-Browne

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

When performing any task for an extended period of time, attention fluctuates between good and bad states. These fluctuations affect performance in the moment, but may also have lasting consequences for what gets encoded into memory. Experiment 1 establishes this relationship between attentional states and memory, by showing that subsequent memory for an item was predicted by a response time index of sustained attention (average response time during the three trials prior to stimulus onset). Experiment 2 strengthens the causal interpretation of this predictive relationship by treating the sustained attention index as an independent variable to trigger the appearance of an encoding trial. Subsequent memory was better when items were triggered from good versus bad attentional states. Together, these findings suggest that sustained attention can have downstream consequences for what we remember, and they highlight the inferential utility of adaptive experimental designs. By continuously monitoring attention, we can influence what will later be remembered.

Citing Articles

Perceptual decoupling in the sustained attention to response task is likely: comment on Bedi, Russell, & Helton (2024).

Shelat S, Giesbrecht B Exp Brain Res. 2025; 243(4):86.

PMID: 40053158 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-025-07032-9.

Contextual Influence on Pattern Separation During Encoding.

Garcia-Rueda L, Poch C, Macedo-Pascual J, Campo P NeuroSci. 2025; 6(1).

PMID: 39982265 PMC: 11843873. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci6010013.

Word Repetition and Isolation are Intertwined in Children's Early Language Experiences.

Nencheva M, Schwab J, Lew-Williams C, Fausey C Open Mind (Camb). 2024; 8:1330-1347.

PMID: 39654817 PMC: 11627589. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00172.

Associating EEG functional networks and the effect of sleep deprivation as measured using psychomotor vigilance tests.

Mason S, Junges L, Woldman W, Ftouni S, Anderson C, Terry J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27999.

PMID: 39543217 PMC: 11564749. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78814-4.

Opposing neural processing modes alternate rhythmically during sustained auditory attention.

Kasten F, Busson Q, Zoefel B Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1125.

PMID: 39266696 PMC: 11393317. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06834-x.

References

Yi D, Chun M . Attentional modulation of learning-related repetition attenuation effects in human parahippocampal cortex. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(14):3593-600. PMC: 6725381. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4677-04.2005. View

Kim G, Lewis-Peacock J, Norman K, Turk-Browne N . Pruning of memories by context-based prediction error. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(24):8997-9002. PMC: 4066528. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319438111. View

Salari N, Buchel C, Rose M . Functional dissociation of ongoing oscillatory brain states. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e38090. PMC: 3364191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038090. View

Chiu Y, Egner T . Inhibition-Induced Forgetting Results from Resource Competition between Response Inhibition and Memory Encoding Processes. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(34):11936-45. PMC: 4549404. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-15.2015. View

Otten L, Quayle A, Akram S, Ditewig T, Rugg M . Brain activity before an event predicts later recollection. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(4):489-91. DOI: 10.1038/nn1663. View

Salari N, Rose M . Dissociation of the functional relevance of different pre-stimulus oscillatory activity for memory formation. Neuroimage. 2015; 125:1013-1021. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.037. View

Wolfe J, Horowitz T, Kenner N . Cognitive psychology: rare items often missed in visual searches. Nature. 2005; 435(7041):439-40. PMC: 4224304. DOI: 10.1038/435439a. View

Rosenberg M, Noonan S, DeGutis J, Esterman M . Sustaining visual attention in the face of distraction: a novel gradual-onset continuous performance task. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013; 75(3):426-39. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0413-x. View

Stoeckel L, Garrison K, Ghosh S, Wighton P, Hanlon C, Gilman J . Optimizing real time fMRI neurofeedback for therapeutic discovery and development. Neuroimage Clin. 2014; 5:245-55. PMC: 4141981. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.002. View

10.

Makovski T, Jiang Y, Swallow K . How do observer's responses affect visual long-term memory?. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012; 39(4):1097-105. DOI: 10.1037/a0030908. View

11.

Esterman M, Rosenberg M, Noonan S . Intrinsic fluctuations in sustained attention and distractor processing. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(5):1724-30. PMC: 6827583. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2658-13.2014. View

12.

Sulzer J, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Weiskopf N, Birbaumer N, Blefari M . Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: progress and challenges. Neuroimage. 2013; 76:386-99. PMC: 4878436. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.033. View

13.

Turk-Browne N, Golomb J, Chun M . Complementary attentional components of successful memory encoding. Neuroimage. 2012; 66:553-62. PMC: 3594515. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.053. View

14.

Wagner A, Schacter D, Rotte M, Koutstaal W, Maril A, Dale A . Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science. 1998; 281(5380):1188-91. DOI: 10.1126/science.281.5380.1188. View

15.

deBettencourt M, Cohen J, Lee R, Norman K, Turk-Browne N . Closed-loop training of attention with real-time brain imaging. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(3):470-5. PMC: 4503600. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3940. View

16.

Leber A . Neural predictors of within-subject fluctuations in attentional control. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(34):11458-65. PMC: 6633337. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0809-10.2010. View

17.

Duncan K, Sadanand A, Davachi L . Memory's penumbra: episodic memory decisions induce lingering mnemonic biases. Science. 2012; 337(6093):485-7. PMC: 3527841. DOI: 10.1126/science.1221936. View

18.

Esterman M, Noonan S, Rosenberg M, DeGutis J . In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 23(11):2712-23. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs261. View

19.

Fleck M, Mitroff S . Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(11):943-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02006.x. View

20.

Chun M, Golomb J, Turk-Browne N . A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009; 62:73-101. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427. View