» Articles » PMID: 37326544

The Role of Recollection and Familiarity in Visual Working Memory: A Mixture of Threshold and Signal Detection Processes

Overview
Journal Psychol Rev
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Jun 16
PMID 37326544
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whether working memory reflects a thresholded recollection process whereby only a limited number of items are maintained in memory, or a signal detection process in which each studied item is increased in familiarity strength, is a topic of considerable debate. A review of visual working memory studies that have examined receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) across a broad set of materials and test conditions indicates that signal detection and threshold processes contribute to working memory. In addition, the role that these two processes play varies systematically across conditions, such that a threshold process plays a particularly critical role when binary old/new judgments are required, when changes are relatively discrete, and when the hippocampus does contribute to performance. In contrast, a signal detection process plays a greater role when confidence judgments are required, when the materials or the changes are global in nature, and when the hippocampus contributes to performance. In addition, the ROC results indicate that in standard single-probe tests of working memory, items that are maintained in an active recollected state support both recall-to-accept and recall-to-reject responses; whereas in complex-probe tests, recollection preferentially supports recall-to-reject; and in item-recognition tests it preferentially supports recall-to-accept. Moreover, there is growing evidence that these threshold and strength-based processes are related to distinct states of conscious awareness whereby they support perceiving- and sensing-based responses, respectively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Cortically Disparate Visual Features Evoke Content-Independent Load Signals during Storage in Working Memory.

Jones H, Thyer W, Suplica D, Awh E J Neurosci. 2024; 44(44).

PMID: 39327004 PMC: 11529812. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0448-24.2024.


Perceptual encoding benefit of visual memorability on visual memory formation.

Ye C, Guo L, Wang N, Liu Q, Xie W Cognition. 2024; 248:105810.

PMID: 38733867 PMC: 11369960. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105810.


A spatially continuous diffusion model of visual working memory.

Fennell A, Ratcliff R Cogn Psychol. 2023; 145:101595.

PMID: 37659278 PMC: 10546276. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101595.

References
1.
Warrington E, Baddeley A . Amnesia and memory for visual location. Neuropsychologia. 1974; 12(2):257-63. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90011-6. View

2.
Borders A, Ranganath C, Yonelinas A . The hippocampus supports high-precision binding in visual working memory. Hippocampus. 2021; 32(3):217-230. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23401. View

3.
Luck S, Vogel E . Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17(8):391-400. PMC: 3729738. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006. View

4.
Dube C, Rotello C, Heit E . Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: it's a response bias effect. Psychol Rev. 2010; 117(3):831-63. DOI: 10.1037/a0019634. View

5.
Hoffman H . Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: evidence from source attribution biases. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997; 23(2):371-83. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.2.371. View