» Articles » PMID: 29230878

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Flash Glucose Monitoring in People with Type 1 Diabetes and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia

Overview
Journal Diabet Med
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2017 Dec 13
PMID 29230878
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes is associated with mortality and morbidity, especially where awareness of hypoglycaemia is impaired. Clinical pathways for access to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and flash glucose monitoring technologies are unclear. We assessed the impact of CGM and flash glucose monitoring in a high-risk group of people with Type 1 diabetes.

Methods: A randomized, non-masked parallel group study was undertaken. Adults with Type 1 diabetes using a multiple-dose insulin-injection regimen with a Gold score of ≥ 4 or recent severe hypoglycaemia were recruited. Following 2 weeks of blinded CGM, they were randomly assigned to CGM (Dexcom G5) or flash glucose monitoring (Abbott Freestyle Libre) for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference in time spent in hypoglycaemia (below 3.3 mmol/l) from baseline to endpoint with CGM versus flash glucose monitoring.

Results: Some 40 participants were randomized to CGM (n = 20) or flash glucose monitoring (n = 20). The participants (24 men, 16 women) had a median (IQR) age of 49.6 (37.5-63.5) years, duration of diabetes of 30.0 (21.0-36.5) years and HbA of 56 (48-63) mmol/mol [7.3 (6.5-7.8)%]. The baseline median percentage time < 3.3 mmol/l was 4.5% in the CGM group and 6.7% in the flash glucose monitoring. At the end-point the percentage time < 3.3 mmol/l was 2.4%, and 6.8% respectively (median between group difference -4.3%, P = 0.006). Time spent in hypoglycaemia at all thresholds, and hypoglycaemia fear, were different between groups, favouring CGM.

Conclusion: CGM more effectively reduces time spent in hypoglycaemia in people with Type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia compared with flash glucose monitoring. (Clinical Trial Registry No: NCT03028220).

Citing Articles

International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024 Diabetes Technologies: Glucose Monitoring.

Tauschman M, Cardona-Hernandez R, DeSalvo D, Hood K, Laptev D, Lindholm Olinder A Horm Res Paediatr. 2025; 97(6):615-635.

PMID: 39884260 PMC: 11854985. DOI: 10.1159/000543156.


7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

Diabetes Care. 2024; 48(Supplement_1):S146-S166.

PMID: 39651978 PMC: 11635043. DOI: 10.2337/dc25-S007.


The impact of closed-loop automated insulin delivery systems on hypoglycaemia awareness in people living with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Efthymiadis A, Bastounis A, Liu L, Bourlaki M, Spinos D, Tsikopoulos K J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024; 23(2):2251-2261.

PMID: 39610490 PMC: 11599659. DOI: 10.1007/s40200-024-01492-6.


Addressing Inequity in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Access: Leveraging the Hospital in the Continuum of Care.

Rickards G, Harrod J, Del Valle K, Caballero A, Palermo N, McDonnell M J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; :19322968241288917.

PMID: 39558481 PMC: 11574776. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241288917.


Techniques for Implementing Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Primary Care: Key CGM Updates and Highlights from the ATTD 2024 Conference [Podcast].

McCoy R Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024; 17:3577-3583.

PMID: 39345824 PMC: 11436668. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S491642.


References
1.
Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kroger J, Weitgasser R . Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 388(10057):2254-2263. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31535-5. View

2.
Little S, Leelarathna L, Walkinshaw E, Tan H, Chapple O, Lubina-Solomon A . Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in long-standing type 1 diabetes: a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose self-monitoring.... Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(8):2114-22. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0030. View

3.
Dahlquist G, Kallen B . Mortality in childhood-onset type 1 diabetes: a population-based study. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(10):2384-7. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2384. View

4.
Reddy M, Jugnee N, El Laboudi A, Spanudakis E, Anantharaja S, Oliver N . A randomized controlled pilot study of continuous glucose monitoring and flash glucose monitoring in people with Type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia. Diabet Med. 2017; 35(4):483-490. PMC: 5888121. DOI: 10.1111/dme.13561. View

5.
Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Faerch L, Allingbjerg M, Agesen R, Thorsteinsson B . The influence of new European Union driver's license legislation on reporting of severe hypoglycemia by patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014; 38(1):29-33. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-1417. View