» Articles » PMID: 27996321

Measures of Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes and the Effect of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Overview
Date 2016 Dec 21
PMID 27996321
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To report the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic variability (GV) indices, factors predictive of change, and to correlate variability with conventional markers of glycemia.

Methods: Data from the JDRF study of CGM in participants with type 1 diabetes were used. Participants were randomized to CGM or self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG). GV indices at baseline, at 26 weeks in both groups, and at 52 weeks in the control group were analyzed. The associations of demographic and clinical factors with change in GV indices from baseline to 26 weeks were evaluated.

Results: Baseline data were available for 448 subjects. GV indices were all outside normative ranges (P < 0.001). Intercorrelation between GV indices was common and, apart from coefficient of variation (CV), low blood glucose index (LBGI), and percentage of glycemic risk assessment diabetes equation score attributable to hypoglycemia (%GRADE), all indices correlate positively with HbA1c. There was strong correlation between time spent in hypoglycemia, and CV, LBGI, and %GRADE, but not with HbA1c. A significant reduction in all GV indices, except lability index and mean absolute glucose change per unit time (MAG), was demonstrated in the intervention group at 26 weeks compared with the control group. Baseline factors predicting a change in GV with CGM include baseline HbA1c, baseline GV, frequency of daily SMBG, and insulin pump use.

Conclusions: CGM reduces most GV indices compared with SMBG in people with type 1 diabetes. The strong correlation between time spent in hypoglycemia and CV, LBGI, and %GRADE highlights the value of these metrics in assessing hypoglycemia as an adjunct to HbA1c in the overall assessment of glycemia.

Citing Articles

International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024 Diabetes Technologies: Glucose Monitoring.

Tauschman M, Cardona-Hernandez R, DeSalvo D, Hood K, Laptev D, Lindholm Olinder A Horm Res Paediatr. 2025; 97(6):615-635.

PMID: 39884260 PMC: 11854985. DOI: 10.1159/000543156.


Enhancing the Impact of Individualized Nutrition Therapy with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Feedback in Overweight and Obese Individuals with Prediabetes.

Basiri R, Cheskin L Nutrients. 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39683399 PMC: 11643611. DOI: 10.3390/nu16234005.


Clinical relevance of short-term glycemic variability in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a narrative review.

Bombaci B, Passanisi S, Lombardo F, Salzano G Transl Pediatr. 2024; 13(7):1231-1241.

PMID: 39144438 PMC: 11320011. DOI: 10.21037/tp-24-114.


Assessing satisfaction, quality of life, and HbA1c changes in type 1 diabetes patients who are using freestyle libre glucose monitoring.

Alsahli M, Alalwan A, Aburisheh K, Alarifi F, Alshaya H, Alkholaif A J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(6):2367-2374.

PMID: 39027821 PMC: 11254085. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1630_23.


Continuous glucose monitoring metrics in pregnancy with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Jeeyavudeen M, Crosby M, Pappachan J World J Methodol. 2024; 14(1):90316.

PMID: 38577196 PMC: 10989406. DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i1.90316.