» Articles » PMID: 29193776

Bayesian Statistical Approaches to Evaluating Cognitive Models

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2017 Dec 2
PMID 29193776
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cognitive models aim to explain complex human behavior in terms of hypothesized mechanisms of the mind. These mechanisms can be formalized in terms of mathematical structures containing parameters that are theoretically meaningful. For example, in the case of perceptual decision making, model parameters might correspond to theoretical constructs like response bias, evidence quality, response caution, and the like. Formal cognitive models go beyond verbal models in that cognitive mechanisms are instantiated in terms of mathematics and they go beyond statistical models in that cognitive model parameters are psychologically interpretable. We explore three key elements used to formally evaluate cognitive models: parameter estimation, model prediction, and model selection. We compare and contrast traditional approaches with Bayesian statistical approaches to performing each of these three elements. Traditional approaches rely on an array of seemingly ad hoc techniques, whereas Bayesian statistical approaches rely on a single, principled, internally consistent system. We illustrate the Bayesian statistical approach to evaluating cognitive models using a running example of the Linear Ballistic Accumulator model of decision making (Brown SD, Heathcote A. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cogn Psychol 2008, 57:153-178). WIREs Cogn Sci 2018, 9:e1458. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1458 This article is categorized under: Neuroscience > Computation Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making Psychology > Theory and Methods.

Citing Articles

Developmental patterns of inhibition and fronto-basal-ganglia white matter organisation in healthy children and children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Singh M, Skippen P, He J, Thomson P, Fuelscher I, Caeyenberghs K Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(15):e70010.

PMID: 39460623 PMC: 11512212. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70010.


Listening efficiency in adult cochlear-implant users compared with normally-hearing controls at ecologically relevant signal-to-noise ratios.

Perea Perez F, Hartley D, Kitterick P, Zekveld A, Naylor G, Wiggins I Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1214485.

PMID: 37520928 PMC: 10379644. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1214485.


Troubleshooting Bayesian cognitive models.

Baribault B, Collins A Psychol Methods. 2023; 30(1):128-154.

PMID: 36972080 PMC: 10522800. DOI: 10.1037/met0000554.


On Testing and Developing Cognitive Models.

Palmeri T Comput Brain Behav. 2020; 2(3-4):193-196.

PMID: 33225217 PMC: 7678747. DOI: 10.1007/s42113-019-00041-2.


The Bayesian causal inference model benefits from an informed prior to predict proprioceptive drift in the rubber foot illusion.

Schurmann T, Vogt J, Christ O, Beckerle P Cogn Process. 2019; 20(4):447-457.

PMID: 31435749 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-019-00928-9.


References
1.
Kruschke J . Posterior predictive checks can and should be Bayesian: comment on Gelman and Shalizi, 'Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics'. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2012; 66(1):45-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02063.x. View

2.
Wagenmakers E, Lodewyckx T, Kuriyal H, Grasman R . Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: a tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method. Cogn Psychol. 2010; 60(3):158-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001. View

3.
Annis J, Evans N, Miller B, Palmeri T . Thermodynamic Integration and Steppingstone Sampling Methods for Estimating Bayes Factors: A Tutorial. J Math Psychol. 2019; 89:67-86. PMC: 6374050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2019.01.005. View

4.
Ratcliff R, Childers R . Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making. Decision (Wash D C ). 2015; 2015. PMC: 4517692. DOI: 10.1037/dec0000030. View

5.
Shen J, Palmeri T . Modelling individual difference in visual categorization. Vis cogn. 2017; 24(3):260-283. PMC: 5278636. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1236053. View