» Articles » PMID: 28154496

Modelling Individual Difference in Visual Categorization

Overview
Journal Vis cogn
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2017 Feb 4
PMID 28154496
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent years has seen growing interest in understanding, characterizing, and explaining individual differences in visual cognition. We focus here on individual differences in visual categorization. Categorization is the fundamental visual ability to group different objects together as the same kind of thing. Research on visual categorization and category learning has been significantly informed by computational modeling, so our review will focus both on how formal models of visual categorization have captured individual differences and how individual difference have informed the development of formal models. We first examine the potential sources of individual differences in leading models of visual categorization, providing a brief review of a range of different models. We then describe several examples of how computational models have captured individual differences in visual categorization. This review also provides a bit of an historical perspective, starting with models that predicted no individual differences, to those that captured group differences, to those that predict true individual differences, and to more recent hierarchical approaches that can simultaneously capture both group and individual differences in visual categorization. Via this selective review, we see how considerations of individual differences can lead to important theoretical insights into how people visually categorize objects in the world around them. We also consider new directions for work examining individual differences in visual categorization.

Citing Articles

Relating a Spiking Neural Network Model and the Diffusion Model of Decision-Making.

Umakantha A, Purcell B, Palmeri T Comput Brain Behav. 2022; 5(3):279-301.

PMID: 36408474 PMC: 9673774. DOI: 10.1007/s42113-022-00143-4.


Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review.

Wedel M, Pieters R, van der Lans R Psychometrika. 2022; 88(2):697-729.

PMID: 35852670 PMC: 10188393. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-022-09876-4.


Model-guided search for optimal natural-science-category training exemplars: A work in progress.

Nosofsky R, Sanders C, Zhu X, McDaniel M Psychon Bull Rev. 2018; 26(1):48-76.

PMID: 29987765 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1508-8.


Bayesian statistical approaches to evaluating cognitive models.

Annis J, Palmeri T Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017; 9(2).

PMID: 29193776 PMC: 5814360. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1458.

References
1.
Lamberts K . Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. Psychol Rev. 2000; 107(2):227-60. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.227. View

2.
Nosofsky R, Palmeri T . Comparing exemplar-retrieval and decision-bound models of speeded perceptual classification. Percept Psychophys. 1997; 59(7):1027-48. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205518. View

3.
Lewandowsky S, Yang L, Newell B, Kalish M . Working memory does not dissociate between different perceptual categorization tasks. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012; 38(4):881-904. DOI: 10.1037/a0027298. View

4.
Palmeri T, Nosofsky R . Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001; 54(1):197-235. DOI: 10.1080/02724980042000084. View

5.
Richler J, Palmeri T . Visual category learning. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015; 5(1):75-94. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1268. View