Modelling Individual Difference in Visual Categorization
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Recent years has seen growing interest in understanding, characterizing, and explaining individual differences in visual cognition. We focus here on individual differences in visual categorization. Categorization is the fundamental visual ability to group different objects together as the same kind of thing. Research on visual categorization and category learning has been significantly informed by computational modeling, so our review will focus both on how formal models of visual categorization have captured individual differences and how individual difference have informed the development of formal models. We first examine the potential sources of individual differences in leading models of visual categorization, providing a brief review of a range of different models. We then describe several examples of how computational models have captured individual differences in visual categorization. This review also provides a bit of an historical perspective, starting with models that predicted no individual differences, to those that captured group differences, to those that predict true individual differences, and to more recent hierarchical approaches that can simultaneously capture both group and individual differences in visual categorization. Via this selective review, we see how considerations of individual differences can lead to important theoretical insights into how people visually categorize objects in the world around them. We also consider new directions for work examining individual differences in visual categorization.
Relating a Spiking Neural Network Model and the Diffusion Model of Decision-Making.
Umakantha A, Purcell B, Palmeri T Comput Brain Behav. 2022; 5(3):279-301.
PMID: 36408474 PMC: 9673774. DOI: 10.1007/s42113-022-00143-4.
Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review.
Wedel M, Pieters R, van der Lans R Psychometrika. 2022; 88(2):697-729.
PMID: 35852670 PMC: 10188393. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-022-09876-4.
Model-guided search for optimal natural-science-category training exemplars: A work in progress.
Nosofsky R, Sanders C, Zhu X, McDaniel M Psychon Bull Rev. 2018; 26(1):48-76.
PMID: 29987765 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1508-8.
Bayesian statistical approaches to evaluating cognitive models.
Annis J, Palmeri T Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017; 9(2).
PMID: 29193776 PMC: 5814360. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1458.