» Articles » PMID: 29167290

Evaluation of Whole-Genome Sequencing for Mycobacterial Species Identification and Drug Susceptibility Testing in a Clinical Setting: a Large-Scale Prospective Assessment of Performance Against Line Probe Assays and Phenotyping

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2017 Nov 24
PMID 29167290
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Use of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for routine mycobacterial species identification and drug susceptibility testing (DST) is becoming a reality. We compared the performances of WGS and standard laboratory workflows prospectively, by parallel processing at a major mycobacterial reference service over the course of 1 year, for species identification, first-line resistance prediction, and turnaround time. Among 2,039 isolates with line probe assay results for species identification, 74 (3.6%) failed sequencing or WGS species identification. Excluding these isolates, clinically important species were identified for 1,902 isolates, of which 1,825 (96.0%) were identified as the same species by WGS and the line probe assay. A total of 2,157 line probe test results for detection of resistance to the first-line drugs isoniazid and rifampin were available for 728 complex isolates. Excluding 216 (10.0%) cases where there were insufficient sequencing data for WGS to make a prediction, overall concordance was 99.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.9 to 99.6%), sensitivity was 97.6% (91.7 to 99.7%), and specificity was 99.5% (99.0 to 99.7%). A total of 2,982 phenotypic DST results were available for 777 complex isolates. Of these, 356 (11.9%) had no WGS comparator due to insufficient sequencing data, and in 154 (5.2%) cases the WGS prediction was indeterminate due to discovery of novel, previously uncharacterized mutations. Excluding these data, overall concordance was 99.2% (98.7 to 99.5%), sensitivity was 94.2% (88.4 to 97.6%), and specificity was 99.4% (99.0 to 99.7%). Median processing times for the routine laboratory tests versus WGS were similar overall, i.e., 20 days (interquartile range [IQR], 15 to 31 days) and 21 days (15 to 29 days), respectively ( = 0.41). In conclusion, WGS predicts species and drug susceptibility with great accuracy, but work is needed to increase the proportion of predictions made.

Citing Articles

A practical guide to the diagnosis and management of suspected Non-tuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease (NTM-PD) in the United Kingdom.

Dhasmana D, Whitaker P, van der Laan R, Frost F NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024; 34(1):45.

PMID: 39709516 PMC: 11663218. DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00403-9.


Quantitative drug susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using unassembled sequencing data and machine learning.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(8):e1012260.

PMID: 39102420 PMC: 11326700. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012260.


Toward Characterizing Environmental Sources of Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) at the Species Level: A Tutorial Review of NTM Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Classification.

Zhang L, Lin T, Liu W, Ling F ACS Environ Au. 2024; 4(3):127-141.

PMID: 38765059 PMC: 11100324. DOI: 10.1021/acsenvironau.3c00074.


Management Challenges of Extrapulmonary Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infection: A Single-Center Case Series and Literature Review.

Kiselinova M, Naesens L, Huis In t Veld D, Boelens J, Van Braeckel E, Vande Weygaerde Y Pathogens. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38276158 PMC: 10819148. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13010012.


Discordance between different bioinformatic methods for identifying resistance genes from short-read genomic data, with a focus on .

Davies T, Swann J, Sheppard A, Pickford H, Lipworth S, AbuOun M Microb Genom. 2023; 9(12).

PMID: 38100178 PMC: 10763500. DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001151.


References
1.
Brown-Elliott B, Philley J . Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria. Microbiol Spectr. 2017; 5(1). PMC: 11687460. DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0027-2016. View

2.
Walker T, Kohl T, Omar S, Hedge J, Del Ojo Elias C, Bradley P . Whole-genome sequencing for prediction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility and resistance: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015; 15(10):1193-1202. PMC: 4579482. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00062-6. View

3.
Nathavitharana R, Cudahy P, Schumacher S, Steingart K, Pai M, Denkinger C . Accuracy of line probe assays for the diagnosis of pulmonary and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2017; 49(1). PMC: 5898952. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01075-2016. View

4.
Tortoli E . Microbiological features and clinical relevance of new species of the genus Mycobacterium. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014; 27(4):727-52. PMC: 4187642. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00035-14. View

5.
Pankhurst L, Del Ojo Elias C, Votintseva A, Walker T, Cole K, Davies J . Rapid, comprehensive, and affordable mycobacterial diagnosis with whole-genome sequencing: a prospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015; 4(1):49-58. PMC: 4698465. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00466-X. View