» Articles » PMID: 29150510

Vibrio Parahaemolyticus and Vibrio Vulnificus Recovered from Oysters During an Oyster Relay Study

Overview
Date 2017 Nov 19
PMID 29150510
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

and are naturally occurring estuarine bacteria and are the leading causes of seafood-associated infections and mortality in the United States. Though multiple-antibiotic-resistant and strains have been reported, resistance patterns in vibrios are not as well documented as those of other foodborne bacterial pathogens. Salinity relaying (SR) is a postharvest processing (PHP) treatment to reduce the abundances of these pathogens in shellfish harvested during the warmer months. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility (AMS), pathogenicity, and genetic profiles of and recovered from oysters during an oyster relay study. Isolates ( [ = 296] and [ = 94]) were recovered from oysters before and during the 21-day relaying study to detect virulence genes ( and ) and genes correlated with virulence () using multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR). AMS to 20 different antibiotics was investigated using microbroth dilution, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to study the genetic profiles of the isolates. Twenty percent of isolates were , while 1 and 2% of were and , respectively. More than 77% of the isolates and 30% of the isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial. Forty-eight percent of and 8% of isolates were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. All isolates demonstrated a high genetic diversity, even among those isolated from the same site and having a similar AMS profile. No significant effects of the relaying process on AMS, virulence genes, or PFGE profiles of and were observed. Analysis of the antibiotic resistance profiles of and isolated from oysters during this study indicated that more than 48% of isolates were resistant to two or more antimicrobials, including those recommended by the CDC for treating infections. Also, the isolates showed high MICs for some of the infection treatment antibiotics. Monitoring of AMS profiles of this bacterium is important to ensure optimal treatment of infections and improve food safety. Our study showed no significant differences in the AMS profiles of ( = 0.26) and ( = 0.23) isolated from the oysters collected before versus after relaying. This suggests that the salinity of the relaying sites did not affect the AMS profiles of the isolates, although it did reduce the numbers of these bacteria in oysters (S. Parveen et al., J Food Sci 82:484-491, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13584).

Citing Articles

Diseases of marine fish and shellfish in an age of rapid climate change.

Rowley A, Baker-Austin C, Boerlage A, Caillon C, Davies C, Duperret L iScience. 2024; 27(9):110838.

PMID: 39318536 PMC: 11420459. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110838.


Antibiotic resistance trends among and isolated from the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland: a longitudinal study.

Morgado M, Brumfield K, Chattopadhyay S, Malayil L, Alawode T, Amokeodo I Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(6):e0053924.

PMID: 38809043 PMC: 11218627. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00539-24.


Tools to Enumerate and Predict Distribution Patterns of Environmental and .

Waidner L, Potdukhe T Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894160 PMC: 10609196. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102502.


and biofilm dispersal from microplastics influenced by simulated human environment.

Leighton R, Xiong L, Anderson G, Astarita G, Cai G, Norman R Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1236471.

PMID: 37854331 PMC: 10579612. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1236471.


Antibiotic Resistance in Selected Emerging Bacterial Foodborne Pathogens-An Issue of Concern?.

Grudlewska-Buda K, Bauza-Kaszewska J, Wiktorczyk-Kapischke N, Budzynska A, Gospodarek-Komkowska E, Skowron K Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 37237783 PMC: 10215942. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12050880.


References
1.
Parveen S, Jahncke M, Elmahdi S, Crocker H, Bowers J, White C . High Salinity Relaying to Reduce Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in Chesapeake Bay Oysters (Crassostrea virginica). J Food Sci. 2017; 82(2):484-491. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13584. View

2.
Warner E, Oliver J . Multiplex PCR assay for detection and simultaneous differentiation of genotypes of Vibrio vulnificus biotype 1. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2008; 5(5):691-3. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2008.0120. View

3.
Parveen S, Hettiarachchi K, Bowers J, Jones J, Tamplin M, McKay R . Seasonal distribution of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay oysters and waters. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008; 128(2):354-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.019. View

4.
. Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food - 10 states, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010; 59(14):418-22. View

5.
Martinez-Urtaza J, Simental L, Velasco D, DePaola A, Ishibashi M, Nakaguchi Y . Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005; 11(8):1319-20. PMC: 3320470. DOI: 10.3201/eid1108.050322. View