» Articles » PMID: 35862751

Investigating the Relationship Between Nitrate, Total Dissolved Nitrogen, and Phosphate with Abundance of Pathogenic Vibrios and Harmful Algal Blooms in Rehoboth Bay, Delaware

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

spp. and phytoplankton are naturally abundant in marine environments. Recent studies have suggested that the co-occurrence of phytoplankton and the pathogenic bacterium Vibrio parahaemolyticus is due to shared ecological factors, such as nutrient requirements. We compared these communities at two locations in the Delaware Inland Bays, representing a site with high anthropogenic inputs (Torquay Canal) and a less developed area (Sloan Cove). In 2017 to 2018, using light microscopy, we were able to identify the presence of many bloom-forming algal species, such as Karlodinium veneficum, Dinophysis acuminata, Heterosigma akashiwo, and Chattonella subsalsa. Dinoflagellate biomass was higher at Torquay Canal than that at Sloan Cove. and Chloromorum toxicum were found only at Torquay Canal and were not observed in Sloan Cove. Most probable number real-time PCR revealed V. parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in environmental samples. The abundance of vibrios and their virulence genes varied between sites, with a significant association between total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), PO, total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), and pathogenic markers. A generalized linear model revealed that principal component 1 of environmental factors (temperature, dissolved oxygen, salinity, TDN, PO, TDP, NO:NO, NO, and NH) was the best at detecting total () V. parahaemolyticus, suggesting that they are the prime drivers for the growth and distribution of pathogenic spp. Vibrio-associated illnesses have been expanding globally over the past several decades (A. Newton, M. Kendall, D. J. Vugia, O. L. Henao, and B. E. Mahon, Clin Infect Dis 54:S391-S395, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis243). Many studies have linked this expansion with an increase in global temperature (J. Martinez-Urtaza, B. C. John, J. Trinanes, and A. DePaola, Food Res Int 43:10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.04.001; L. Vezzulli, R. R. Colwell, and C. Pruzzo, Microb Ecol 65:817-825, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0163-2; R. N. Paranjpye, W. B. Nilsson, M. Liermann, and E. D. Hilborn, FEMS Microbiol Ecol 91:fiv121, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiv121). Temperature and salinity are the two major factors affecting the distribution of spp. (D. Ceccarelli and R. R. Colwell, Front Microbiol 5:256, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00256). However, sp. abundance can also be affected by nutrient load and marine plankton blooms (V. J. McKenzie and A. R. Townsend, EcoHealth 4:384-396, 2007; L. Vezzulli, C. Pruzzo, A. Huq, and R. R. Colwell, Environ Microbiol Rep 2:27-33, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00128.x; S. Liu, Z. Jiang, Y. Deng, Y. Wu, J. Zhang, et al. Microbiologyopen 7:e00600, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.600). The expansion of spp. in marine environments calls for a deeper understanding of the biotic and abiotic factors that play a role in their abundance. We observed that pathogenic spp. were most abundant in areas that favor the proliferation of harmful algal bloom (HAB) species. These results can inform managers, researchers, and oyster growers on factors that can influence the growth and distribution of pathogenic spp. in the Delaware Inland Bays.

Citing Articles

Climate change will amplify the impacts of harmful microorganisms in aquatic ecosystems.

Seymour J, McLellan S Nat Microbiol. 2025; 10(3):615-626.

PMID: 40021939 DOI: 10.1038/s41564-025-01948-2.


prophage and bacterial host dynamics during diversification, succession, and Atlantic invasion of Pacific-native .

Foxall R, Means J, Marcinkiewicz A, Schillaci C, DeRosia-Banick K, Xu F mBio. 2023; 15(1):e0285123.

PMID: 38112441 PMC: 10790759. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02851-23.


Tools to Enumerate and Predict Distribution Patterns of Environmental and .

Waidner L, Potdukhe T Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894160 PMC: 10609196. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102502.


Modeling pH and Temperature Effects as Climatic Hazards in V and Planktonic Growth and Biofilm Formation.

Velez K, Leighton R, Decho A, Pinckney J, Norman R Geohealth. 2023; 7(4):e2022GH000769.

PMID: 37091291 PMC: 10114089. DOI: 10.1029/2022GH000769.

References
1.
Panicker G, Bej A . Real-time PCR detection of Vibrio vulnificus in oysters: comparison of oligonucleotide primers and probes targeting vvhA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(10):5702-9. PMC: 1265985. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.5702-5709.2005. View

2.
Elmahdi S, Parveen S, Ossai S, DaSilva L, Jahncke M, Bowers J . Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus Recovered from Oysters during an Oyster Relay Study. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017; 84(3). PMC: 5772242. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01790-17. View

3.
Greenfield D, Gooch Moore J, Stewart J, Hilborn E, George B, Li Q . Temporal and Environmental Factors Driving and Populations and Their Associations With Harmful Algal Blooms in South Carolina Detention Ponds and Receiving Tidal Creeks. Geohealth. 2020; 1(9):306-317. PMC: 7007149. DOI: 10.1002/2017GH000094. View

4.
Jeong H . Mixotrophy in red tide algae raphidophytes. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2011; 58(3):215-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00550.x. View

5.
Parveen S, Jacobs J, Ozbay G, Chintapenta L, Almuhaideb E, Meredith J . Seasonal and Geographical Differences in Total and Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus Levels in Seawater and Oysters from the Delaware and Chesapeake Bays Determined Using Several Methods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020; 86(23). PMC: 7657622. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01581-20. View