» Articles » PMID: 29107996

Epigenetic Memory Via Concordant DNA Methylation is Inversely Correlated to Developmental Potential of Mammalian Cells

Abstract

In storing and transmitting epigenetic information, organisms must balance the need to maintain information about past conditions with the capacity to respond to information in their current and future environments. Some of this information is encoded by DNA methylation, which can be transmitted with variable fidelity from parent to daughter strand. High fidelity confers strong pattern matching between the strands of individual DNA molecules and thus pattern stability over rounds of DNA replication; lower fidelity confers reduced pattern matching, and thus greater flexibility. Here, we present a new conceptual framework, Ratio of Concordance Preference (RCP), that uses double-stranded methylation data to quantify the flexibility and stability of the system that gave rise to a given set of patterns. We find that differentiated mammalian cells operate with high DNA methylation stability, consistent with earlier reports. Stem cells in culture and in embryos, in contrast, operate with reduced, albeit significant, methylation stability. We conclude that preference for concordant DNA methylation is a consistent mode of information transfer, and thus provides epigenetic stability across cell divisions, even in stem cells and those undergoing developmental transitions. Broader application of our RCP framework will permit comparison of epigenetic-information systems across cells, developmental stages, and organisms whose methylation machineries differ substantially or are not yet well understood.

Citing Articles

Extensive DNA methylome rearrangement during early lamprey embryogenesis.

Angeloni A, Fissette S, Kaya D, Hammond J, Gamaarachchi H, Deveson I Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1977.

PMID: 38438347 PMC: 10912607. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46085-2.


Childhood environment influences epigenetic age and methylation concordance of a CpG clock locus in British-Bangladeshi migrants.

Stoger R, Choi M, Begum K, Leeman G, Emes R, Melamed P Epigenetics. 2022; 18(1):2153511.

PMID: 36495138 PMC: 9980690. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2022.2153511.


DNA methylation changes during long-term in vitro cell culture are caused by epigenetic drift.

Franzen J, Georgomanolis T, Selich A, Kuo C, Stoger R, Brant L Commun Biol. 2021; 4(1):598.

PMID: 34011964 PMC: 8134454. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02116-y.


A genome-scale map of DNA methylation turnover identifies site-specific dependencies of DNMT and TET activity.

Ginno P, Gaidatzis D, Feldmann A, Hoerner L, Imanci D, Burger L Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):2680.

PMID: 32471981 PMC: 7260214. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16354-x.


UHRF1-repressed 5'-hydroxymethylcytosine is essential for the male meiotic prophase I.

Pan H, Jiang N, Sun S, Jiang H, Xu J, Jiang X Cell Death Dis. 2020; 11(2):142.

PMID: 32081844 PMC: 7035279. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-2333-3.


References
1.
Monk M, Boubelik M, Lehnert S . Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development. Development. 1987; 99(3):371-82. DOI: 10.1242/dev.99.3.371. View

2.
Thomson J, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro S, Waknitz M, Swiergiel J, Marshall V . Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998; 282(5391):1145-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145. View

3.
Zhao L, Sun M, Li Z, Bai X, Yu M, Wang M . The dynamics of DNA methylation fidelity during mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genome Res. 2014; 24(8):1296-307. PMC: 4120083. DOI: 10.1101/gr.163147.113. View

4.
Kundaje A, Meuleman W, Ernst J, Bilenky M, Yen A, Heravi-Moussavi A . Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature. 2015; 518(7539):317-30. PMC: 4530010. DOI: 10.1038/nature14248. View

5.
Russell D, Zinder N . Hemimethylation prevents DNA replication in E. coli. Cell. 1987; 50(7):1071-9. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90173-5. View