» Articles » PMID: 29045080

A Systematic Review of Calorie Labeling and Modified Calorie Labeling Interventions: Impact on Consumer and Restaurant Behavior

Overview
Date 2017 Oct 19
PMID 29045080
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Evidence on the effects of restaurant calorie labeling on consumer and restaurant behavior is mixed. This paper examined: (1) consumer responses to calorie information alone or compared to modified calorie information and (2) changes in restaurant offerings following or in advance of menu labeling implementation.

Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Policy File, and PAIS International to identify restaurant calorie labeling studies through October 1, 2016, that measured calories ordered, consumed, or available for purchase on restaurant menus. The reference lists of calorie labeling articles were also searched.

Results: Fifty-three studies were included: 18 in real-world restaurants, 9 in cafeterias, and 21 in laboratory or simulation settings. Five examined restaurant offerings.

Conclusions: Because of a lack of well-powered studies with strong designs, the degree to which menu labeling encourages lower-calorie purchases and whether that translates to a healthier population are unclear. Although there is limited evidence that menu labeling affects calories purchased at fast-food restaurants, some evidence demonstrates that it lowers calories purchased at certain types of restaurants and in cafeteria settings. The limited data on modified calorie labels find that such labels can encourage lower-calorie purchases but may not differ in effects relative to calorie labels alone.

Citing Articles

Impact of out-of-home nutrition labelling on people with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Trompeter N, Duffy F, Peebles I, Wadhera E, Chambers K, Sharpe H BMJ Public Health. 2025; 3(1):e000862.

PMID: 40017917 PMC: 11816730. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000862.


Estimating the impacts of calorie labels in fast-food settings using a novel comparison: Comparing California drive-through and in-store purchases.

Weitzman B, Heng L, Mijanovich T, Abrams C, Rummo P, Bragg M Appetite. 2025; 207:107864.

PMID: 39824223 PMC: 11884985. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.107864.


Evaluating the association between the introduction of mandatory calorie labelling and energy consumed using observational data from the out-of-home food sector in England.

Polden M, Jones A, Essman M, Adams J, Bishop T, Burgoine T Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 9(2):277-286.

PMID: 39587333 PMC: 11860223. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02032-1.


University Food Environment Assessment Methods and Their Implications: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Dahl A, Ademu L, Fandetti S, Harris R JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e54955.

PMID: 39178404 PMC: 11380064. DOI: 10.2196/54955.


The impact of the English calorie labelling policy on the energy content of food offered and purchased in worksite cafeterias: a natural experiment.

Luick M, Bandy L, Jebb S, Pechey R BMC Nutr. 2024; 10(1):110.

PMID: 39138549 PMC: 11321062. DOI: 10.1186/s40795-024-00914-1.


References
1.
Elbel B, Mijanovich T, Dixon L, Abrams C, Weitzman B, Kersh R . Calorie labeling, fast food purchasing and restaurant visits. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 21(11):2172-9. PMC: 3947482. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20550. View

2.
Sarink D, Peeters A, Freak-Poli R, Beauchamp A, Woods J, Ball K . The impact of menu energy labelling across socioeconomic groups: A systematic review. Appetite. 2016; 99:59-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.022. View

3.
VanEpps E, Roberto C, Park S, Economos C, Bleich S . Restaurant Menu Labeling Policy: Review of Evidence and Controversies. Curr Obes Rep. 2016; 5(1):72-80. PMC: 5124489. DOI: 10.1007/s13679-016-0193-z. View

4.
Restrepo B . Calorie Labeling in Chain Restaurants and Body Weight: Evidence from New York. Health Econ. 2016; 26(10):1191-1209. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3389. View

5.
Bleich S, Wolfson J, Jarlenski M . Calorie Changes in Large Chain Restaurants: Declines in New Menu Items but Room for Improvement. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 50(1):e1-e8. PMC: 4691555. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.007. View